Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RISC-V nommu support v6
In-Reply-To: <20191031155222.GA7270@lst.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1910311312540.16921@viisi.sifive.com>
References: <20191028121043.22934-1-hch@lst.de> <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1910301311240.6452@viisi.sifive.com> <20191031155222.GA7270@lst.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 01:21:21PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > I tried building this series from your git branch mentioned above, and 
> > booted it with a buildroot userspace built from your custom buildroot 
> > tree.  Am seeing some segmentation faults from userspace (below). 
> > 
> > Am still planning to merge your patches.
> > 
> > But I'm wondering whether you are seeing these segmentation faults also? 
> > Or is it something that might be specific to my test setup?
> 
> I just built a fresh image using make -j4 with that report and it works
> perfectly fine with my tree.

OK, good to know.

If there are other folks out there who are using Christoph's nommu patch 
set, it'd be great to get testing feedback.


- Paul