Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:01:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:01:32 -0400 Received: from cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.152.185]:34482 "EHLO opus.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:01:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:01:29 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: David Woodhouse Cc: Keith Owens , Benjamin LaHaise , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Modutils 2.5 change, start running this command now Message-ID: <20011012080129.B9992@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> In-Reply-To: <7202.1002886635@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <20283.1002888881@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20283.1002888881@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 01:14:41PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > kaos@ocs.com.au said: > > I was going to do it that way. The problem is that it gives no > > indication if the module has been checked or not. Adding > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS says that somebody has reviewed the module and > > decided that exporting no symbols is the correct behaviour. It is the > > difference between no maintainer and a maintained module. > > If all you want to know is whether modules are maintained or not, look to > see how many have had MODULE_LICENSE(sic) tags added. Not really. There's been people auditing the drivers, which is probably what would happen here. Either way even. Forcing a break will make it much more obvious is all. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/