Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 1 Nov 2019 09:45:24 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Cc:     peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/ioremap: Use WARN_ONCE instead of printk() +
 WARN_ON_ONCE()
Message-ID: <20191101084524.GA29724@nazgul.tnic>
References: <1572425838-39158-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com>
 <20191031110304.GE21133@nazgul.tnic>
 <5DBACB61.90809@huawei.com>
 <20191031154916.GA24152@nazgul.tnic>
 <5DBB03B0.5060003@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5DBB03B0.5060003@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:54:24PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> Yep,  WARN_ONCE alway return true in that case.

Are you sure it does that always?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--