Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp247350ybx; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 02:53:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjjfCzbI/UCG5l9PQ27FflpKIvhbvJO4T5Du6zHiVHkDSLM6ImslOBkp2OQC2SkwNdjGUT X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1cc3:: with SMTP id i3mr8575950ejh.81.1572602027328; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:53:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572602027; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fjOaKVVoKPKpRy9UjUh+9xfKxcXsJ/gHFHuUjLPdz5fWO1Nvd7P4ySuNGgXwXR89Ha xWNQuSCfhHNTs/75MxUSj3yHwjsPBRY6boCWkpKX0Wou70gaayuamGTee37iesIN0Fp5 ytUr2BW/rt8QESbVRtqFZwAQvl5J+FuRy3fv1SzlBzVLdQsFSjfRE80FWPMRfrb3t6ew 2KLF91zLn1PkGogzG0Vtb6d2fcBfzSh15LkKUCiGzLuxB6WjS3X6Si7rjpPyVWMoND2w hU9BmMk66D5CyjIVzqsktW0ZQQ5NqIHeXIyF4RtuMDx2wYxO0DBrhcnsu+oQHSwuJJup cWyQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=cQPGWKJIcn4Bp2Ac+7+3RFqXIEst3BIgm4hXeVkme20=; b=r9ddCS7/TtIqW1YmcSIemalEuHgPhEFrjJTfr1r5WZfwlS++iIiIeTcwlILXN0SAy8 6p+9M1jyY6Pdm+yoRANlUZw1a0w+ACsD+SSg4ATrsLqt3Mkhg/2aHKww1vxeJ+cJX9k6 ez9nbeZSTGJdmfLe4mLaWG7gi3kcxE0bgoOOqb2x6ezFEWKD0lrIcrL/R9x4rbxY1ZhX hIyNwHeQHlgjVyeE5DvEVN2PphbMx0DPpnOOj7pTQ1PE2oLEZZBDLbxlzTC6NX4vWqDt CtldIk1T9CIgS0wH1STPn4ypb4qAxE2MrOee44yqmWI/j9cygrsYfrGwOClelIzf8p/F tNDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=aOoWh+fa; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z16si7324293edi.241.2019.11.01.02.53.23; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=aOoWh+fa; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728472AbfKAJuv (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 05:50:51 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47480 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726957AbfKAJuv (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 05:50:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (lfbn-1-10718-76.w90-89.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.89.68.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1614D21734; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 09:50:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572601850; bh=HdDiE3u28/EH/XJwBUZXniN/4FBeDOyfUzlaLLrQt8U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aOoWh+fa9xUVINtmIFGgLJb5/BUb3CxH2sXYOSzSHO36L6ljk6t0EpPajLqaU8xE7 mKbvygogrFwXFvu1nBL0sAtUyDMpcbcDONIDYacL9I2TcteuiT9K/dB1teL0eOSRxN Kp9WtFItaERwdzHT/tzTckSRZ+H6kyl8hML6xc+I= Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:13:55 +0100 From: Maxime Ripard To: zhong jiang Cc: broonie@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: sun4i: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO to simplify the code Message-ID: <20191101091355.ibbet6a2zb23bpjn@hendrix> References: <1572530979-27595-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6vhl2j34wvp3caxz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1572530979-27595-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --6vhl2j34wvp3caxz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:09:39PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: > It is better to use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR. > > Signed-off-by: zhong jiang > --- > sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c > index d0a8d58..72012a6 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c > +++ b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c > @@ -1174,10 +1174,8 @@ static int sun4i_i2s_init_regmap_fields(struct device *dev, > i2s->field_fmt_sr = > devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, i2s->regmap, > i2s->variant->field_fmt_sr); > - if (IS_ERR(i2s->field_fmt_sr)) > - return PTR_ERR(i2s->field_fmt_sr); > > - return 0; > + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(i2s->field_fmt_sr); I don't find it "better". This couples the error handling and the success case, and it makes it harder to extend in the future. Maxime --6vhl2j34wvp3caxz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCXbv3UwAKCRDj7w1vZxhR xSByAQCjg2HWuIqPYN2yl52RWX3gUhD8/UFFCrxTI4MANT8XIAD/YFUGXPMc30Zx R7UevyMTvzJVznWeORM6F+mRArQGYQM= =Pr2a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6vhl2j34wvp3caxz--