Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp343021ybx; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 04:29:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxrDnnxe43b8VQ+gvihoN2B1acukss8j2IGUxiaDXJ4VMywekt4MkWM7OQ+zhS1sxW7bQia X-Received: by 2002:a50:91c4:: with SMTP id h4mr11996380eda.36.1572607782663; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 04:29:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572607782; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TTrfBqO2JYbEtz/XrlOejow9d/nnilAP9vrKZg5gfl3j8hrS2nQSq14pi9UUL4ohe0 ZZuELLoj47IxkSHmet0/CGWwC0fxX6prlx+AoYlFYVlNW3HWW7YZuPB0a90/+uhrkrnn Qj8cC/BThokAJ977yeilV+Dlq7tpfeKE5HqscYCsNCESSqPPY8D1neVMCXK/bgS2xMeV v4AVv5xAS7UzvoTCTr8CuG4Mhb/Z/1+4MfHA2Qrcru9ZkFa0GqQDIPtjvT30f9D7TKxZ IHXtTqKCemPhyZuyQf7B5ZaSqQYvfXEfN467MEiBdomitVWvhNdi20K3GgzTyjrwMXNT bERw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=kCodc1dwiBFtLxA8G20yhHmGjuk+PTKM0HEpHZAni/o=; b=LRdNWS520Z0M32g/mfgTjpyFmBuxaRx47WbLWvd/j88Qk+FWqjY93ZRKdrF9STduNs FM7l6Pzae4OhUiLDQomqkJd+4QGFhmkOZZhoVIvRnJemSfrvxiv3w5GlptuhPLPTLmGq Il2HIROYG/Nhal8a/FtSrMhZrAj5SOg1A/Pueh8cTOazLJr+sJ1Yiv9rkZDe8ZJbgppw 3xoSAOv3d4qwbW8d6OSRfGQlD2pGMvTad3bJh+QYOoSIdM+3eHm4qpiTvMGNV9cqqzvn yF95O/cs7HvU2tGa9c3x4/1VwawmEkD77c9MxSdH0aWFWQcIWiFZUj6LKLy6NjzUIoeF FMeA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t1si5531504eju.132.2019.11.01.04.29.19; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 04:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730129AbfKAK7H (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 06:59:07 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:33942 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729789AbfKAK7G (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 06:59:06 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D7F1FB; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 03:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.20]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFE7A3F6C4; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 03:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:59:03 +0000 From: Andrew Murray To: Dilip Kota Cc: jingoohan1@gmail.com, gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@intel.com, cheol.yong.kim@intel.com, chuanhua.lei@linux.intel.com, qi-ming.wu@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dwc: PCI: intel: PCIe RC controller driver Message-ID: <20191101105902.GB9723@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20191021130339.GP47056@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <661f7e9c-a79f-bea6-08d8-4df54f500019@linux.intel.com> <20191025090926.GX47056@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <6f8b2e72-caa3-30b8-4c76-8ad7bb321ce2@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6f8b2e72-caa3-30b8-4c76-8ad7bb321ce2@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1+81 (426a6c1) (2018-08-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 04:59:17PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote: > > On 10/25/2019 5:09 PM, Andrew Murray wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:04:21PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote: > > > Hi Andrew Murray, > > > > > > On 10/21/2019 9:03 PM, Andrew Murray wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:39:19PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote: > > > > > + > > > > > +void dw_pcie_link_set_n_fts(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 n_fts) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + u32 val; > > > > > + > > > > > + val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL); > > > > > + val &= ~PORT_LOGIC_N_FTS; > > > > > + val |= n_fts; > > > > > + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, val); > > > > > +} > > > > I notice that pcie-artpec6.c (artpec6_pcie_set_nfts) also writes the FTS > > > > and defines a bunch of macros to support this. It doesn't make sense to > > > > duplicate this there. Therefore I think we need to update pcie-artpec6.c > > > > to use this new function. > > > I think we can do in a separate patch after these changes get merged and > > > keep this patch series for intel PCIe driver and required changes in PCIe > > > DesignWare framework. > > The pcie-artpec6.c is a DWC driver as well. So I think we can do all this > > together. This helps reduce the technical debt that will otherwise build up > > in duplicated code. > I agree with you to remove duplicated code, but at this point not sure what > all drivers has defined FTS configuration. > Reviewing all other DWC drivers and removing them can be done in one single > separate patch. I'm not asking to set up an FTS configuration for all DWC drivers, but instead to move this helper function you've created to somewhere like pcie-designware.c and call it from this driver and pcie-artpec6.c. Thanks, Andrew Murray > > Regards, > Dilip