Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932593AbWAKEqA (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:46:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932752AbWAKEqA (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:46:00 -0500 Received: from smtp.enter.net ([216.193.128.24]:20747 "EHLO smtp.enter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932593AbWAKEp7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:45:59 -0500 From: "D. Hazelton" To: Denis Vlasenko Subject: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:57:01 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: Andrew Morton , Yaroslav Rastrigin , andersen@codepoet.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <174467f50601082354y7ca871c7k@mail.gmail.com> <200601100333.57301.dhazelton@enter.net> <200601101526.24786.vda@ilport.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <200601101526.24786.vda@ilport.com.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601102357.02502.dhazelton@enter.net> X-Virus-Checker-Version: Enter.Net Virus Scanner 1.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2158 Lines: 48 On Tuesday 10 January 2006 08:26, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 10:33, D. Hazelton wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 02:33, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > > > > > > > Andrew, I think this is a rare (on lkml at least) case when guy > > > does not want to participate in development in a Linux way > > > but wants to just pay for development instead: > > > "I want this to work good under Linux. I want to pay > > > up to to whoever will agree to do that. Anybody?" > > > > > > Do not dismiss him lightly. There are LOTS of people which aren't > > > hackish at all. An order of magniture more than 'us' computer geeks. > > > M$ is successful because it uses this resource. > > > We may want to think how can we use it too. > > > > > > No, I don't think you, or someone else on this list can efficiently > > > use it, but distros, being more commercially oriented, maybe can. > > > > This is true. The types of bounties I have seen in OS development do not > > usually reach much beyond $500. If distro's were to get behind this and > > start offering bounties of large sums for _working_ code for hardware > > there might be a response. > > I meant a different thing. Distro is a commercial entity. > Users can buy services from businesses. "Write (or fix) me a driver" > is a service. > > People inclined to just pay for code instead of helping with coding > may have greater success talking to distros. > > Of course, distros then will hire someone from lkml crowd to actually do > it. > > If there will be enough of cash flow from such requests, this can > becode somebody's full time job. Almost exactly what I meant. Truth is, though, that I mentioned the "bounty" system because its flexible enough that the distro's wouldn't have to hire someone full-time. However, I can see that it would make a difference in several respects. Statement withdrawn. D. Hazelton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/