Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 3 Nov 2019 23:19:25 -0600
From:   Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
To:     Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 0/3] QCOM smmu-500 wait-for-safe handling for sdm845
Message-ID: <20191104051925.GC5299@hector.lan>
Mail-Followup-To: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
References: <cover.1568966170.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
 <20191101163136.GC3603@willie-the-truck>
 <af7e9a14ae7512665f0cae32e08c8b06@codeaurora.org>
 <20191101172508.GB3983@willie-the-truck>
 <119d4bcf5989d1aa0686fd674c6a3370@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <119d4bcf5989d1aa0686fd674c6a3370@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 11:01:59PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> >>> What's the plan for getting this merged? I'm not happy taking the
> >>> firmware
> >>> bits without Andy's ack, but I also think the SMMU changes should go via
> >>> the IOMMU tree to avoid conflicts.
> >>>
> >>> Andy?
> >>>
> >>
> >>Bjorn maintains QCOM stuff now if I am not wrong and he has already
> >>reviewed
> >>the firmware bits. So I'm hoping you could take all these through IOMMU
> >>tree.
> >
> >Oh, I didn't realise that. Is there a MAINTAINERS update someplace? If I
> >run:
> >
> >$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
> >
> >in linux-next, I get:
> >
> >Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT)
> >linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org (open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT)
> >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
> >
> 
> It hasn't been updated yet then. I will leave it to Bjorn or Andy to comment
> on this.

The rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated.  All kidding aside, I
ack'ed both.  Bjorn will indeed be coming on as a co-maintener at some point.
He has already done a lot of yeomans work in helping me out the past 3 months.

Andy