Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:00:43 +0800
From: Coywolf Qi Hunt <qiyong@fc-cn.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why no -mm git tree?
Message-ID: <20060111070043.GA7858@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20060111055616.GA5976@localhost.localdomain> <20060110224451.44c9d3da.akpm@osdl.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060110224451.44c9d3da.akpm@osdl.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 957
Lines: 32

On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:44:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Coywolf Qi Hunt <qiyong@fc-cn.com> wrote:
> >
> > Why don't use a -mm git tree?
> >
> 
> Because everthing would take me 100x longer?

Really? So does Linus?

> 
> I'm looking into generating a pullable git tree for each -mm.  Just as a
> convenience for people who can't type "ftp".

That doesn't help much if it's only for each -mm.
If you make git commits for each each patch merged in, then
we can always run the `current' -mm git tree.

Test the -mm patches, not leave them sleeping for most of the time.

> 
> That'll just be a dump of the whole -mm lineup into git.  I don't know how
> workable it'll be - we'll see.
> 

-- 
Coywolf Qi Hunt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/