Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 13:12:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 13:12:23 -0400 Received: from mail11.speakeasy.net ([216.254.0.211]:59146 "EHLO mail11.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 13:12:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:08:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Borrelli To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: No love for the PPC Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm sorry about the tone of this e-mail, but it is somewhat painful when, after downloading a new kernel to play with, it doesn't compile on the ppc. It isn't even big problems either. A single line (#include ) is missing from pc_keyb.c and has been for at least three -ac releases. Now, process.c in arch/ppc/kernel/ dies from an undeclared identifier (init_mmap). I'm sure the appropriate response would be to fix them myself, but I don't know enough about the kernel or the ppc arhitecture. I'm also sure that if Theo (or anyone like him) was to read this s/he would tell me to stop whining. Anyway, the real question is, why does the ppc arhitecture /always/ break between versions? I'll stop complaining now. Regards, -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/