Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191101061411.16988-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <20191101061411.16988-2-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
In-Reply-To: <20191101061411.16988-2-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Nov 2019 08:00:14 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJbmFd5wZ0RCP2baqv-bjWwzaJ+hLqtGeYjK5LPJ54dXA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libfdt: add SPDX-License-Identifier to libfdt wrappers
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc:     devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 1:19 AM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
>
> These are kernel source code even though they are just two-line wrappers.
>
> Files without explicit license information fall back to GPL-2.0-only,
> which is the project default.

That is true and these are kernel only files, but given they are just
a wrapper around the .c files, maybe they should have the same
license?

Rob