Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191018161033.261971-1-samitolvanen@google.com>
 <20191101221150.116536-1-samitolvanen@google.com> <20191101221150.116536-14-samitolvanen@google.com>
 <02c56a5273f94e9d832182f1b3cb5097@www.loen.fr> <CABCJKucVON6uUMH6hVP7RODqH8u63AP3SgTCBWirrS30yDOmdA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCJKucVON6uUMH6hVP7RODqH8u63AP3SgTCBWirrS30yDOmdA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:59:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdkDbX4zLChH_DKrnOah1sJjTA-e3uZOXUP6nUs-EaJreg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] arm64: preserve x18 when CPU is suspended
To:     Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:38 PM Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 5:20 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >  ENTRY(cpu_do_suspend)
> > >       mrs     x2, tpidr_el0
> > > @@ -73,6 +75,9 @@ alternative_endif
> > >       stp     x8, x9, [x0, #48]
> > >       stp     x10, x11, [x0, #64]
> > >       stp     x12, x13, [x0, #80]
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
> > > +     str     x18, [x0, #96]
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Do we need the #ifdefery here? We didn't add that to the KVM path,
> > and I'd feel better having a single behaviour, specially when
> > NR_CTX_REGS is unconditionally sized to hold 13 regs.
>
> I'm fine with dropping the ifdefs here in v5 unless someone objects to this.

Oh, yeah I guess it would be good to be consistent.  Rather than drop
the ifdefs, would you (Marc) be ok with conditionally setting
NR_CTX_REGS based on CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK, and doing so in KVM?
(So 3 ifdefs, rather than 0)?

Without any conditionals or comments, it's not clear why x18 is being
saved and restored (unless git blame survives, or a comment is added
in place of the ifdefs in v6).
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers