Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:32:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:31:58 -0400 Received: from dfw-smtpout2.email.verio.net ([129.250.36.42]:14735 "EHLO dfw-smtpout2.email.verio.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:31:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3BC7372F.5456C516@bigfoot.com> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:32:15 -0700 From: Tim Moore Organization: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.20p10i i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Which kernel (Linus or ac)? In-Reply-To: <200110120201.f9C21XNQ004348@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> <001901c152ca$0b42c080$0600000a@petersohn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am lucky to need only the ipchains simple functions (accounting, forward, masq and firewall). rgds, tim. Jens Petersohn wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Horst von Brand" > To: "Tim Moore" > Cc: ; > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:01 PM > Subject: Re: Which kernel (Linus or ac)? > > > Tim Moore said: > > > > [...] > > > > > Any reason not to stick with 2.2.20preX? Especially where stability is > > > important. > > > > iptables vs ipchains for me. > > Yes, same here. The machine was running 2.2.16 for the longest time, > but I upgraded to obtain iptables support. -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/