Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Tue, 05 Nov 2019 07:44:13 +0800
From:   cang@codeaurora.org
To:     Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
Cc:     asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org,
        rnayak@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@android.com, saravanak@google.com, salyzyn@google.com,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@synopsys.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
        Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: Introduce a vops for resetting host
 controller
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR04MB69911784473463D0926AE3B5FC7F0@MN2PR04MB6991.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1571804009-29787-1-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org>
 <1571804009-29787-2-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org>
 <MN2PR04MB69911784473463D0926AE3B5FC7F0@MN2PR04MB6991.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <1ab0a928184dd11540726d6456056e02@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-11-04 22:28, Avri Altman wrote:
> Hi,
>> 
>> Some UFS host controllers need their specific implementations of 
>> resetting to
>> get them into a good state. Provide a new vops to allow the platform 
>> driver to
>> implement this own reset operation.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
> Did you withdraw from this patches and insert them to one of your fix 
> bundle?
> I couldn't tell.
> As this is a vop, in what way its functionality can't be included in
> the device reset that was recently added?
> 
> Thanks,
> Avri

Hi Avri,

Sorry for making you confused.
Yes, I dropped this series because it cannot fulfil its purpose anymore. 
I come up with a way which puts the reset in the right place in UFS QCOM 
platfrom driver without an extra vops, so I inserted the two changes in 
fix bundle 3.

Thanks,
Can Guo.