Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Tue, 05 Nov 2019 07:46:56 +0800
From:   cang@codeaurora.org
To:     "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@micron.com>
Cc:     Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
        nguyenb@codeaurora.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
        saravanak@google.com, salyzyn@google.com,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@synopsys.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
        Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] RE: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: Introduce a vops for
 resetting host controller
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR08MB568495A62486DBDFDEDE9F20DB7F0@BN7PR08MB5684.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1571804009-29787-1-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org>
 <1571804009-29787-2-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org>
 <MN2PR04MB69911784473463D0926AE3B5FC7F0@MN2PR04MB6991.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <BN7PR08MB568495A62486DBDFDEDE9F20DB7F0@BN7PR08MB5684.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <66e04095315ec02598ebc12136add80d@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-11-04 22:34, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Hi, Can
> 
> I agree with Avri, you can add this series patches to your bundle, and
> that is also easy to review for us.
> Otherwise, we are confused by somehow crossing different series 
> patches.
> Thanks,
> 
> //Bean

Hi Bean,

I moved the two changes to fix bundle 3. The vops is not needed anymore.
Meanwhile I find it inappropriate to put the host controller reset 
inside
the device reset vops. So you can check the new changes in fix bundle 3.

Regards,
Can Guo.

>> 
>> Hi,
>> >
>> > Some UFS host controllers need their specific implementations of
>> > resetting to get them into a good state. Provide a new vops to allow
>> > the platform driver to implement this own reset operation.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
>> Did you withdraw from this patches and insert them to one of your fix 
>> bundle?
>> I couldn't tell.
>> As this is a vop, in what way its functionality can't be included in 
>> the device reset
>> that was recently added?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Avri