Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751486AbWAKPmi (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:42:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751491AbWAKPmi (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:42:38 -0500 Received: from EXCHG2003.microtech-ks.com ([65.16.27.37]:36035 "EHLO EXCHG2003.microtech-ks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751486AbWAKPmh (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:42:37 -0500 From: "Roger Heflin" To: "'linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)'" , "'Christopher Friesen'" Cc: Subject: RE: FAT and Microsoft patent? Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:52:34 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcYWxDJTGD6yA8iwSWGf7sf1O9XZiQAAnQNA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2006 15:36:15.0597 (UTC) FILETIME=[C24E99D0:01C616C4] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1499 Lines: 46 > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of > linux-os (Dick Johnson) > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:32 AM > To: Christopher Friesen > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: FAT and Microsoft patent? > > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Christopher Friesen wrote: > > > According to various sources, the USPTO has ruled that Microsoft's > > patent on FAT is valid. > > > > Does this impact Linux? Will we have to remove the filesystem? > > > > Chris > > You mean the expired patent circa 1980 for their first use of > this technology? This is 2006, 26 years later. Patents don't > run forever, you know. That's the reason why it has become > the 'universal' file- system, not because it's a good > file-system, but because it's now in the public domain due to > expiration. > > And, can you cite the 'various sources'. They seem to be like > spooks under the bridge, completely without merit. The patent upheld is for long filenames on a FAT filesystem, not for FAT in general. Not a major thing to go without. It would be nice it the original poster would have done 30 seconds more research before posting. Roger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/