Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932219AbWAKSci (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:32:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932450AbWAKSci (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:32:38 -0500 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.195]:30707 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932219AbWAKSch (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:32:37 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:reply-to:organization:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=ARdoAdOnhUTiFv87yavOV/7NQaP81q63aUgMaRJsQYP3Nnexs7NY6gQEzRx3h70M+piqY3mU+6Sm6LMHCzX4EEjfWzmmCW4U2g5eU0pGAxedgVeiX/PRWbcQqv1gMvjsjhxiDj5rGFB/enzkSkGZapJ1KzYVQkUSmye7ZQy62SA= Message-ID: <43C54F32.3040509@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:02:18 +0530 Reply-To: chaitanya.hazarey@gmail.com Organization: Grid Comp & Ecom Lab (C-212), School of Technology and Computer Science, Tata Institue of Fundamental Research, Mumbai User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Back to the Future ? or some thing sinister ? References: <20060109040322.GA2683@localhost.localdomain> <728201270601090726i256cf19bj48be55621b86931f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <728201270601090726i256cf19bj48be55621b86931f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chaitanya Vinay Hazarey Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1262 Lines: 43 Ram Gupta wrote: >On 1/8/06, Nathan Lynch wrote: > > >>Chaitanya Hazarey wrote: >> >> >>>We have got a machine, lets say X , make is IBM and the CPU is Intel >>>Pentium 4 2.60 GHz. Its running a 2.6.13.1 Kernel and previously, >>> >>> > > >Is this machine's time is synchronized with some server using ntp. I >had seen some very similar issue when the clock deviation was more >than a second .If clock is adjusted and time difference becomes more >than 2 sec the diffence becomes negative because timeval has its >members as signed int.It think that issue might be playing a role >here. > > > Nope tried every thing, shutting down the ntp server, changing the Ntp server, any thing I do it still will hang intermittently. And if the problem is because of the Ntp why should it hang only on 2.6 not 2.4 kernels ? And the point is that when it reaches that stage all the commands seem to execute ultra slow. Any help for diagnosing the problem is most welcome. Thanks, Chaitanya - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/