Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:05:30 +0000
From:   Arthur Gautier <baloo@gandi.net>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: uaccess: fix regression in unsafe_get_user
Message-ID: <20191105160530.vdaii44gckfo45rw@khany>
References: <20190216234702.GP2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20190217034121.bs3q3sgevexmdt3d@khany>
 <20190217042201.GU2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902181347500.1549@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <CALCETrXyard2OXmOafiLks3YuyO=ObbjDXB6NJo_08rL4M6azw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190218215150.xklqbfckwmbtdm3t@khany>
 <20190926095825.zkdpya55yjusvv4g@khany>
 <20190926140939.GD18383@zn.tnic>
 <20191010164951.kr2epy5lyywgngt6@khany>
 <20191105141112.GB28418@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191105141112.GB28418@zn.tnic>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 03:11:12PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 04:49:51PM +0000, Arthur Gautier wrote:
> > I did not receive neither the patch Andy provided, nor the comments made
> > on it. But I'd be happy to help and/or take over to fix those if someone could
> > send me both.
> 
> Yes, please do, it seems Andy's busy. You can find the whole thread here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190215235901.23541-1-baloo@gandi.net/
> 
> and you can download it in mbox format.
> 
> Care to take Andy's patch, work in the comments I made to it, test it,
> write a commit message, i.e., productize it?
> 
> So that we get this thing moving...
> 
> Thx.
> 

Hello Boris,

Thank you! But I believe this is the patch I sent, I know Andy sent a
patchset with two patches, I believe privately (not copied to a public
ML) to some of the recepients here. I got a copy of the second patch
but not the first one.

I believe from discussions here, that comments have been made on those
patchset and because I was not Cc-ed on those patches, I do not have
neither the full patchset nor the comments.

I cannot take over the work, nor finish the patchset.

Would anyone have a copy of the thread and could send them my way?

Thank you so much!

-- 
\o/ Arthur
 G  Gandi.net