Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:59:59 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes, revisited
Message-ID: <20191105165959.GA2776207@kroah.com>
References: <20191104014510.102356-1-Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191104014510.102356-1-Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 08:44:56PM -0500, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> The rest of the conversion from internal error numbers to the
> standard values used in the rest of the kernel.
> 
> Patch 10/10 is logically separate, merging multiple #defines
> into one place in errno.h.  It's included in the series because
> it depends on patch 1/10.
> 
> Valdis Kletnieks (10):
>   staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_FORMATERR
>   staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_MEDIAERR
>   staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_EOF
>   staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_INVALIDFID
>   staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_ERROR
>   staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - remove unused codes
>   staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_SUCCESS
>   staging: exfat: Collapse redundant return code translations
>   staging: exfat: Correct return code
>   errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody

You forgot to say what changed from v1?