Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp1246801ybx; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:52:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyMVJqGSCJz3Q/+mnXk9lEWF/D6nDVahVmlifGXiil9WDeA7quTEYt5HhzrSu5XecqNviWS X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:57d7:: with SMTP id u23mr4830076ejr.130.1572987134948; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 12:52:14 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572987134; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gGB9upilyPtWdqZ4LumY7Oqda0QaIX7KzOmYcrvkl/ISVAnH9fhdZhrgsptuWwdY9f 6bWGE3EgsUlrZ69FxMsWYbwVByCy891DIIBNZDDuuaQhd5NhcYVfTtxDfR1d1ScKeS9O UzliEkNfeHMNzI7RNVWs6cZTW1jNOmSdRRy3MKwT2mgWQWg3qa8E97kt5DSFK2G00UaJ LMCdIUkIkv54lBMlcZrc+7n/bLdEojQJFNmPstmFZSJCzinPN3vMiqDU5TJ3QTOfTzyC k7vWNTknoOGxydEk8VawurH3euDJTg4aleA/SCe3UIGbqOrNT2yFhYZ1S+Bwy4RVFf3y gFlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=j5lsl+g/wgp4L3jHvl1KID03DzE70mHMRRi3fAuesaI=; b=hRtHUjOny97rLx4HCl1slK2v87PbOrHdRV1pBaFV144QmrEg/N60A0/fz9oWG++0Pp LnXi+Gr5BMPyGvKOzLo01wOe52ASy9fCwJNfFJw16N1ekROFXt8Zmse4ekHtWTV7QORn YqH1n9gILaaB+GtvfrKOwYrymHCv2Re0sPM6YHQ+Bvf8uYHU8cAnSHjQRk+hLcqu6+Rq eEdQYdQQCnDURE8GU/N0IILt2YniTWyKmSOvK4MCmgfy+x2n8MaOtnU2aQuvLxHFFEeA MnAn9Cvt+HzQ00YjPYqDot+OaSjzDQURi8Jrlf66dRICmAReA9trNX8/zn/X0YQaJxbO vw8w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q44si11364241eda.242.2019.11.05.12.51.47; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 12:52:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729882AbfKEUuJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:50:09 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:32816 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729760AbfKEUt5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:49:57 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF31412FC; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:49:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.255]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96B3340139; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 04:32:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:32:40 +0000 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Xiaowei Bao Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, leoyang.li@nxp.com, minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, roy.zang@nxp.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, bhelgaas@google.com, Hou Zhiqiang Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI: layerscape: Add LS1028a support Message-ID: <20191105123233.GA26960@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20190902034319.14026-1-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> <20190902034319.14026-3-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190902034319.14026-3-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:43:19AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > Add support for the LS1028a PCIe controller. > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang > --- > v2: > - No change. > v3: > - Reuse the ls2088 driver data structurt. > v4: > - No change. > v5: > - No change. > v6: > - No change. > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) I have not seen any comment on any layerscape driver patches coming from the maintainers as listed in the MAINTAINERS file (and CCed in this series). I request maintainers ACK on these patches and I expect them to start reviewing your code if they want to be still considered maintainers for this driver. The changes look OK minus Shawn's remark on compatible string that was ignored. Thanks, Lorenzo > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > index 3a5fa26..f24f79a 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > @@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls2088_drvdata = { > static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1012a-pcie", .data = &ls1046_drvdata }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", .data = &ls1021_drvdata }, > + { .compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-pcie", .data = &ls2088_drvdata }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-pcie", .data = &ls1043_drvdata }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie", .data = &ls1046_drvdata }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", .data = &ls2080_drvdata }, > -- > 2.9.5 >