Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp151687ybx; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:32:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzBmpX0u1Z7vVIAjDjilktZ5LIXtVcN6UOR1HU1vccdh86lOmUENZ9bx5K7pdAKkpJWM+fL X-Received: by 2002:a50:9b10:: with SMTP id o16mr649517edi.117.1573018349089; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 21:32:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573018349; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=B7DMagtjU00ShJq4ndJo3Z4TvB28+u52og8vxcBcWUyhYYMDKUnxcmUufLdR/DPnkK ihs7YZs4DfhKS0dfaw6jn2Bp1ZMZfXR9u5saXkRhTUPOypVppiVMpxamE9JpjiIc2wMv 3UbA54CKTxZKmUXrPDUwoLw6Ei5dBWdsTl2e5YhKUHa5UcHU/dFFfRZd4z22sAUgGXPu ltOJR+UP6X2eBYk5Rf4QT0DQUoChVAahkOrX7pKkcrLAM5CgCLB1wmWSDdZy/p51zHwv J64yALFSw1FL6VG/6BmDpAgNV7fhBJidG2sjHBsGzl4wwIj3SF3r5q0+pLVBMxjPXXQc nWPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject; bh=/1gEAsnHRCIVggl6x2v7qkBKYUVVeI2+CPNhPmrOKiQ=; b=AnDpKYIgfQ9UJmOto5DXbFGvl2q8KkMn6x+hg+nMZ5HAZelySE2klA6jSyST1BIlkr Rz5NkiuTwzdcyt37eoQxHl62ZlP3R4PRFDYycgc01zGprG+qYylfj1MLYput4w7jtdLA RLuQ7DezbxjDOfMxuIpHCqnFy2vp16DRwL1t10T0npbwJ+7IxtVHPBrLmHwNGlaxNniu jTFXksI3EXUprtuw5nlM1Lv4q+gJg4cqNCt0iPOZEu7aGOlhmo8dhp3HvcBGndwmZhsr S2EzK47YeluSfnIhRBgZAjIxrTpH1xNkhFWYJ3pdbhelMZJgtryvws/yTegpsTGgbdtE NsVw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a27si2646337edm.187.2019.11.05.21.32.05; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 21:32:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725913AbfKFF3V (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 00:29:21 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:14226 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725616AbfKFF3V (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 00:29:21 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA65Mc3S037495 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 00:29:20 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w3pgptg1v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:29:19 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:29:18 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:29:15 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xA65TEZI53936150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:29:14 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BAFA4060; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:29:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF17A405C; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:29:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.124.35.70]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:29:12 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] Documentation/ABI: mark /sys/kernel/fadump_* sysfs files deprecated To: Hari Bathini , mpe@ellerman.id.au Cc: corbet@lwn.net, mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org References: <20191018130557.2217-1-sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com> <20191018130557.2217-4-sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com> From: Sourabh Jain Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:59:12 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19110605-4275-0000-0000-0000037B2DD2 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19110605-4276-0000-0000-0000388E7A21 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-11-05_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1911060056 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/5/19 10:31 PM, Hari Bathini wrote: > > > On 05/11/19 2:24 PM, Sourabh Jain wrote: >> >> >> On 10/21/19 1:11 PM, Hari Bathini wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 18/10/19 6:35 PM, Sourabh Jain wrote: >>>> The /sys/kernel/fadump_* sysfs files are replicated under >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> +Note: The following FADump sysfs files are deprecated. >>>> + >>>> + Deprecated Alternative >>>> + ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> + /sys/kernel/fadump_enabled /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_enabled >>>> + /sys/kernel/fadump_registered /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_registered >>>> + /sys/kernel/fadump_release_mem /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_release_mem >>> >>> /sys/kernel/fadump/* looks tidy instead of /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_* >>> I mean, /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_enabled => /sys/kernel/fadump/enabled and such.. >> >> >> >> Could you please confirm whether you want to address the sysfs file path differently or >> actually changing the sysfs file name from fadump_enabled to enabled. > > I meant, given the path "/sys/kernel/fadump/", the prefix fadump_ is redundant. > If there are no conventions that we should retain the same file name, I suggest > to drop the fadump_ prefix and just call them enabled, registered, etc.. Oh Yes, I agree with you. It's better not to prefix the sysfs files with fadump_. As we already have directory that convey the same information. I did not find any rule regarding renaming an obsolete sysfs file in Documentation/ABI/README. So lets remove the fadump_ prefix from fadump sysfs file. Thanks, Sourabh Jain