Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] dmaengine: bindings/edma: dma-channel-mask to
 array
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
CC:     <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20190930114055.29315-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
 <20191105165145.GB952516@vkoul-mobl>
From:   Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Message-ID: <fc83b096-f737-4d90-cb3e-0d8eb43c7f12@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:45:47 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191105165145.GB952516@vkoul-mobl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Vinod,

On 05/11/2019 18.51, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 30-09-19, 14:40, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>> - Update the dma-common.yaml and edma binding documentation according to Rob's
>>   suggestion
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Fix dma-common.yaml documentation patch and extend the description of the
>>   dma-channel-mask array
>> - The edma documentation now includes information on the dma-channel-mask array
>>   size for EDMAs with 32 or 64 channels
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Extend the common dma-channel-mask to uint32-array to be usable for
>>   controllers with more than 32 channels
>> - Use the dma-channel-mask instead custom property for available channels for
>>   EDMA.
>>
>> The original patch was part of the EDMA multicore usage series.
>>
>> Rob: I'm not sure if I got the dma-common.yaml update correctly...
>>
>> EDMAs can have 32 or 64 channels depending on the SoC, the dma-channel-mask
>> needs to be an array to be usable for the driver.
> 
> Applied, thanks
> 
> There was a conflict on patch3, I have reolved it, please check.

Looks good, I wonder what caused the conflict. The patch looks identical
in your vinod/next and in my linux-next-wip.

Oh, this is v4 and you have picked the v5. That explains.

Thank you,
- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki