Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932399AbWAKWhW (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:37:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932394AbWAKWhV (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:37:21 -0500 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:10711 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932306AbWAKWhS (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:37:18 -0500 Message-ID: <43C58895.4080006@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:37:09 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Drake CC: "John W. Linville" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Wireless: One small step towards a more perfect union...? References: <20060106042218.GA18974@havoc.gtf.org> <20060111020534.GA22285@tuxdriver.com> <43C5869A.5080107@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43C5869A.5080107@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "srv2.dvmed.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Daniel Drake wrote: > FWIW, my opinion is that the devicescape code should be broken down and > used to extend the existing stack, no matter how 'good' it is. The way > it has been developed (i.e. totally outside of the ieee80211 stack) is > somewhat insulting to our development process. [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [69.134.188.146 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 681 Lines: 17 Daniel Drake wrote: > FWIW, my opinion is that the devicescape code should be broken down and > used to extend the existing stack, no matter how 'good' it is. The way > it has been developed (i.e. totally outside of the ieee80211 stack) is > somewhat insulting to our development process. Strongly agreed, though perhaps some of the blame rests on me for letting ieee80211 sit around too long without a clear maintainer... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/