Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:55:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:55:33 -0400 Received: from math.uci.edu ([128.200.174.70]:19190 "EHLO math.uci.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:55:28 -0400 From: Eric Olson Message-Id: <200110121954.MAA27243@math.uci.edu> Subject: reiserfs performance loss To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 12:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: ejolson@math.uci.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dear Hans and linux-kernel, I am experiencing read performance loss of between 5 to 20 times due to what I think is data fragmentation in big files. I am using linux-2.4.4 with the linux-2.4.4-knfsd-6.g.patch on a dual processor VIA694 motherboard system with a 40GB Maxtor drive on the builtin IDE controller DMA enabled and 512MB main memory. The reiserfs partition is 31GB and about 60-70% full. Also, tail- packing has not been disabled. My application consists of 8 programs tied together using MPI. Each program opens a separate output file and periodically writes about 200k of data every 10-40 minutes. Some programs run on remote machines and use the kernel nfsd to write their files on the server; other programs run directly on the server. It is possible all 8 programs write at the same time. In this way 8 data files of about 500MB each are created. For backup these data files are copied to a second server using rsync. The second server is identical to the main server in both hardware and software. Running hdparm -t gives about 20 MB/sec for each machine. However, time cat *.dat >/dev/null reads the data locally on the secondary server 5 to 20 times faster than reading them locally on the main server. Main server timings are real 6m26.789s user 0m0.210s sys 0m9.630s and secondary server timings are real 0m34.358s user 0m0.250s sys 0m9.830s This is 11 times speed difference. I think the original copies of the files are quite fragmented. However, I would have expected at most a two fold decrease in actual performace. Is this reasonable? I have experienced no other difficulties with reiserfs and like it very much. All the best, Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/