Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <82d17114302562e0c553e2ea936974f77734e86b.camel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-midgard: Tidy up conversion
 to YAML
From:   Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org,
        LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@arm.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Wed, 06 Nov 2019 16:07:39 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqL3NOstoa5ZY1JE9e3Ay=WTmz153H-KbHErhi-GBX-5GA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20191104013932.22505-1-afaerber@suse.de>
         <20191104013932.22505-2-afaerber@suse.de>
         <CAL_JsqL3NOstoa5ZY1JE9e3Ay=WTmz153H-KbHErhi-GBX-5GA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: SUSE Linux GmbH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2019, 08:24 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 7:40 PM Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
> wrote:
> > Instead of grouping alphabetically by third-party vendor, leading
> > to
> > one-element enums, sort by Mali model number, as done for Utgard.
> > 
> > This already allows us to de-duplicate two "arm,mali-t760" sections
> > and
> > will make it easier to add new vendor compatibles.
> 
> That was the intent. Not sure how I messed that up...
> 
> This patch is problematic because there's changes in arm-soc juno/dt
> branch and there's now a patch for exynos5420 (t628). I'd propose I
> apply this such that we don't get a merge conflict with juno/dt and
> we
> finish resorting after rc1 (or when both branches are in Linus'
> tree).

This series has dependencies for the Realtek-side RFC patches and is
not yet ready to merge, so you can take this prep PATCH through your
tree for v5.6 probably, or feel free to rebase/rework as you see fit -
I'd just appreciate being credited at least via Reported-by. :)

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)