Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp711997ybx; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 07:19:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwDqbERUhzKJoUfdBwSVcD06VXKPiPIDO31+8ry8jTZoN8YMLDF56Vyn1Q5YMOuH0iL6e+7 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:db55:: with SMTP id n21mr3292870edt.113.1573053567046; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 07:19:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573053567; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=g6VfFH0FkxG0K3BbHHzIM79RjCxTVUm+0roIaXFgNQZOanCaIook3YaSL4wESmH5cA +8y0pB06mZJS+qfT3UXidZjzalYhwckFNZqG8EkJIsu6MnwwQzAkLy2htthD5FzZd5R7 TuAkfmHCrgCyRT82EU8uEdNndYA8QCsUGAjggd1ebeqhfzQ2XF/40BJhIwe2OZZBn7LH R0RFPeBdrAAl+o2kqnGO+xNB3UTZt14cvTjnS7FSHe0cZwRFuLPugB3WOt1QaXDccIjR h3rK1fE6CbKNCa6aZMqLWLC7gdZB9H4D/WzzXBKpH2Uzq6bzWaxWCJupmOHxJLfMOiMs ru2w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=32gWipbLN0ZwIIl74rxgIOMPdM1bTXb3tcUc9mim7Ko=; b=D5FFqjKrEL9hx12J31Dzzh86lfcF96+Z+2mJX59ilblSnFXg6K3jURTIN19VzbZqjX QLTl4bqDjEql/vmfXLkoHYfmPlhpHFZtT9xkxpL9conuLTW0Gd3Pgh/gq/fHrLyS2Yqv KRDG7bJL/3q48U66NDW+oIHUQsYdeZQIq1e/OgiO130UGXhbHY7A95KHziBEyFJY0Qwg U2ywp6OHz1a0fgpZmTYBkYGamIGvrgpfiZQBOwB/L9ecNYYOaynr4yvdYG/pZOxb+GW0 3pWNKySmBKh8IiyeF/JpTbLJe6unMfBBG9bVEgbh93ce0hOEWk27gcjvzxRhQzKt3rWI PCCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p20si13024812edi.252.2019.11.06.07.19.02; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 07:19:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731971AbfKFPSX (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:18:23 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:48150 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731929AbfKFPSX (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:18:23 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Nov 2019 07:18:22 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,275,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="232906014" Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.54.74.41]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2019 07:18:22 -0800 Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 07:18:22 -0800 From: Sean Christopherson To: Oliver Sang Cc: Jim Mattson , Paolo Bonzini , Dan Cross , Peter Shier , LKML , Linus Torvalds , lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [KVM] 671ddc700f: kvm-unit-tests.vmx.fail Message-ID: <20191106151822.GC16249@linux.intel.com> References: <20191030142358.GB6853@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <20191106144548.GA32541@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191106144548.GA32541@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 10:45:48PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:56:16AM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote: > > It's unclear to me what the delta is, but I do see that the 'vmx' > > suite has failed. That is to be expected if you're getting your > > kvm-unit-tests from the 'master' branch of the kvm-unit-tests repo. > > You will need commit 591b5b54bba1 ("x86: Skip APIC-access address > > tests beyond mapped RAM"), which is in the 'next' branch of the > > kvm-unit-tests repo, but which has not yet made it to the 'master' > > branch. > > Thanks for information! We will wait for master upgrade to update our test > binary. This reminds me, are we still planning on creating "stable" branches for kvm-unit-tests[*]? This topic of came up in a discussion at KVM Forum as well, though I can't remember any of the details. Paolo? [*] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/dc5ff4ed-c6dd-74ea-03ae-4f65c5d58073@redhat.com