Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191104013932.22505-1-afaerber@suse.de> <20191104013932.22505-2-afaerber@suse.de>
 <CAL_JsqL3NOstoa5ZY1JE9e3Ay=WTmz153H-KbHErhi-GBX-5GA@mail.gmail.com> <82d17114302562e0c553e2ea936974f77734e86b.camel@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <82d17114302562e0c553e2ea936974f77734e86b.camel@suse.de>
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:34:12 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLDFefWVdiPuAktctuBpBeOvG-OVhX2aZn=UaiN55nodg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-midgard: Tidy up conversion to YAML
To:     =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc:     linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org,
        LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@arm.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 9:07 AM Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote=
:
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2019, 08:24 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring:
> > On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 7:40 PM Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> > wrote:
> > > Instead of grouping alphabetically by third-party vendor, leading
> > > to
> > > one-element enums, sort by Mali model number, as done for Utgard.
> > >
> > > This already allows us to de-duplicate two "arm,mali-t760" sections
> > > and
> > > will make it easier to add new vendor compatibles.
> >
> > That was the intent. Not sure how I messed that up...
> >
> > This patch is problematic because there's changes in arm-soc juno/dt
> > branch and there's now a patch for exynos5420 (t628). I'd propose I
> > apply this such that we don't get a merge conflict with juno/dt and
> > we
> > finish resorting after rc1 (or when both branches are in Linus'
> > tree).
>
> This series has dependencies for the Realtek-side RFC patches and is
> not yet ready to merge, so you can take this prep PATCH through your
> tree for v5.6 probably, or feel free to rebase/rework as you see fit -
> I'd just appreciate being credited at least via Reported-by. :)

I was assuming the non-RFC patches are good to go, so I was going to
pick up 1, 2, and 7.

Rob