Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:24:18 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc:     DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        syzbot+fb77e97ebf0612ee6914@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Limit to INT_MAX in create_blob ioctl
Message-ID: <201911060920.71D7E76E@keescook>
References: <20191106164755.31478-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191106164755.31478-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 05:47:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The hardened usercpy code is too paranoid ever since:
> 
> commit 6a30afa8c1fbde5f10f9c584c2992aa3c7f7a8fe
> Author: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Date:   Wed Nov 6 16:07:01 2019 +1100
> 
>     uaccess: disallow > INT_MAX copy sizes
> 
> Code itself should have been fine as-is.

I had to go read the syzbot report to understand what was actually being
fixed here. Can you be a bit more verbose in this commit log? It sounds
like huge usercopy sizes were allowed by drm (though I guess they would
fail gracefully in some other way?) but after 6a30afa8c1fb, the copy
would yell about sizes where INT_MAX < size < ULONG_MAX - sizeof(...) ?

What was the prior failure mode that made the existing ULONG_MAX check
safe? Your patch looks fine, though:

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

> Reported-by: syzbot+fb77e97ebf0612ee6914@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 6a30afa8c1fb ("uaccess: disallow > INT_MAX copy sizes")
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> --
> Kees/Andrew,
> 
> Since this is -mm can I have a stable sha1 or something for
> referencing? Or do you want to include this in the -mm patch bomb for
> the merge window?

Traditionally these things live in akpm's tree when they are fixes for
patches in there. I have no idea how the Fixes tags work in that case,
though...

-Kees

> -Daniel
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
> index 892ce636ef72..6ee04803c362 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ drm_property_create_blob(struct drm_device *dev, size_t length,
>  	struct drm_property_blob *blob;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!length || length > ULONG_MAX - sizeof(struct drm_property_blob))
> +	if (!length || length > INT_MAX - sizeof(struct drm_property_blob))
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
>  	blob = kvzalloc(sizeof(struct drm_property_blob)+length, GFP_KERNEL);
> -- 
> 2.24.0.rc2
> 

-- 
Kees Cook