Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5dc3460a.1c69fb81.bfae4.adf1@mx.google.com> <e2ba3c23-4b85-f83b-0ba4-dc0db1b8dd0f@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <e2ba3c23-4b85-f83b-0ba4-dc0db1b8dd0f@collabora.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:04:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYA9TgBWb2TQzSVtV1CWy6ZOXA1=8NjSg5bksrNM1C=NA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: next/master boot bisection: next-20191106 on r8a7795-salvator-x
To:     Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com>
Cc:     Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>, mgalka@collabora.com,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Matt Hart <matthew.hart@linaro.org>,
        Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
        Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:27 PM Guillaume Tucker
<guillaume.tucker@collabora.com> wrote:
> On 06/11/2019 22:15, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> > +static const struct of_device_id bcm_iproc_gpio_of_match[] __initconst = {
> > +     { .compatible = "brcm,iproc-gpio-cca" },
> > +     {}
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bcm_iproc_gpio_of_match);
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver bcm_iproc_gpio_driver = {
> > +     .driver = {
> > +             .name = "iproc-xgs-gpio",
> > +             .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > +             .of_match_table = bcm_iproc_gpio_of_match,
> > +     },
> > +     .probe = iproc_gpio_probe,
> > +     .remove = iproc_gpio_remove,
> > +};
>
> There's a fix for this which Mark sent yesterday[1] and should
> have now been applied, by removing __initconst for the
> of_device_id table.  So this regression should not be present in
> the next linux-next tag.

Confirmed, I pushed a new for-next branch with this fix in it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij