Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:12:31 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/9] x86/io: Speedup schedule out of I/O bitmap user
Message-ID: <20191107091231.GA4131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20191106193459.581614484@linutronix.de>
 <20191106202806.133597409@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191106202806.133597409@linutronix.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 08:35:03PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> There is no requirement to update the TSS I/O bitmap when a thread using it is
> scheduled out and the incoming thread does not use it.
> 
> For the permission check based on the TSS I/O bitmap the CPU calculates the memory
> location of the I/O bitmap by the address of the TSS and the io_bitmap_base member
> of the tss_struct. The easiest way to invalidate the I/O bitmap is to switch the
> offset to an address outside of the TSS limit.
> 
> If an I/O instruction is issued from user space the TSS limit causes #GP to be
> raised in the same was as valid I/O bitmap with all bits set to 1 would do.
> 
> This removes the extra work when an I/O bitmap using task is scheduled out
> and puts the burden on the rare I/O bitmap users when they are scheduled
> in.

This also nicely aligns with that the context switch time is accounted
to the next task. So by doing the expensive part on switch-in gets it
all accounted to the task that caused it.