Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To:     Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
        "christophe.leroy\@c-s.fr" <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
        "paulus\@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
        "benh\@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        "malat\@debian.org" <malat@debian.org>
Cc:     "linuxppc-dev\@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: Support CMDLINE_EXTEND
In-Reply-To: <46da00814535270a2b525de1f75afc79f3abbf5c.camel@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
References: <20190801225006.21952-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> <9262a291-161f-e172-9d13-88a717da9de4@c-s.fr> <46da00814535270a2b525de1f75afc79f3abbf5c.camel@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date:   Thu, 07 Nov 2019 22:21:47 +1100
Message-ID: <87eeyk53uc.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> writes:
> Hi All,
>
> On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 06:40 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>=20
>> Le 02/08/2019 =C3=A0 00:50, Chris Packham a =C3=A9crit :
>> > Bring powerpc in line with other architectures that support extending =
or
>> > overriding the bootloader provided command line.
>> >=20
>> > The current behaviour is most like CMDLINE_FROM_BOOTLOADER where the
>> > bootloader command line is preferred but the kernel config can provide=
 a
>> > fallback so CMDLINE_FROM_BOOTLOADER is the default. CMDLINE_EXTEND can
>> > be used to append the CMDLINE from the kernel config to the one provid=
ed
>> > by the bootloader.
>> >=20
>> > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
>>=20
>> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>
> Just going over some old patches this doesn't appear to be in next. Is
> there anything stopping it from being accepted?

Just me not being overloaded :/, sorry.

Have put it in my next-test branch, which means it should appear in next
in the next few days.

cheers