Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp1208031ybx; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 08:45:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyzaGnoH9QJIl9hOq8t/skYGGYzGaSCVu9yahDnrdxNVl7hwMuUFK11aVL+8CyJ4tnT5YVw X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c943:: with SMTP id h3mr4506825edt.207.1573145146679; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 08:45:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573145146; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mT1fTh7zn0CDHmmVr9HKlkGmco7EW9QTS1UdiKbaPtwqNIguRyofCWXT7NRTUDoE31 qq02dq+dbuOOEpgov9ITODN7QXMnNMiLvEhZfm+fJ8T7YpQrR68x7SCSm67FmMwPQAbv fYXKcGq2zkbZZaXckfaMge5xgISY6FGulwzQtG3zEwqV1KZ+Jx6qaR3ocnBLcJuSXPkk Rq+iiU7OM6Jj4bDQTCPE/vKVDx1VV1Mq1TKATV48DbhCnlNka+bwQ5imYZFLcGMg7Q5q GIvyx2xnlxnln58yUiZdMksjVmKiNYQmoe5TVO1MQ7NZI6MV17WGPK0LOaoQWsZsF8es leIg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id; bh=WsP+SiZqIiPTqjTVj9bEL/Vzyvnctm4/p5H1/h5kxcE=; b=LmDJmQQL1eh+Tx/rn+xjSXlrHwADGbhPd/SwIsNM62JYqmtM59cDZlyZz+vtbg9paS 6MqAvMkAomQnjosqaMN6nOQNYoEQw0Y8fkLwZNzNrHSU3zxIh4HB4UIJ0rAyt3OlhmNJ 0Z/HklpV8o7GQs/9vn1S5eJYlptyATHQkJcHqohOA7Ocxg5HMVgpiOBavupEGN2lrEP9 aicbYazVxftoPPo/owPDNPKyBftyhyTPQWAsdE99gFhPFI9CyIlpBpaSB1qPR3HViP9+ XRUaLQDCtKNuNXxXjZMGbAU8TvvE2t0Vdg6AQmtHholBQkSUwp4wiCpocxrtL+5ZQ5VO W0jg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codethink.co.uk Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k39si1910021edb.99.2019.11.07.08.45.22; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 08:45:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codethink.co.uk Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389577AbfKGQnW (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:43:22 -0500 Received: from imap1.codethink.co.uk ([176.9.8.82]:56281 "EHLO imap1.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728965AbfKGQnV (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:43:21 -0500 Received: from [167.98.27.226] (helo=xylophone) by imap1.codethink.co.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1iSksQ-0004rW-9m; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:43:18 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/93] 4.19.81-stable review From: Ben Hutchings To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:43:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20191106201818.GA105063@kroah.com> References: <20191027203251.029297948@linuxfoundation.org> <20191029162419.cumhku6smn2x2bq4@ucw.cz> <20191029180233.GA587491@kroah.com> <20191106185932.GA2183@amd> <20191106201818.GA105063@kroah.com> Organization: Codethink Ltd. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:18 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:59:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: [...] > > I'm confused. You said "by Tue ... 08:27:02 PM UTC". That 8 PM is 20h, > > but did the release on 10h GMT+1, or 9h UTC -- 9 AM.... so like 11 > > hours early, if I got the timezones right. > > > > Does PM mean something else in the above context? > > Ugh, no, you are right, I was ignoring the PM thing, I thought the -u > option to date would give me a 24 hour date string, and so I thought > that was 8:27 in the morning. > > Let me mess around with 'date' to see if I can come up with a better > string to use here. I guess: > date --rfc-3339=seconds -u > would probably be best? The --rfc-822 option should give you something close to the current format, but with 24-hour numbering. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Software Developer Codethink Ltd https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom