Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp2020909ybx; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 21:50:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxfaflwT8pggegL2ctNaZAFwxNmc7Q7UT0sO14Ih8Oldpx+yyXOs2HItKWQV+y5N+By6Rgp X-Received: by 2002:a50:9a85:: with SMTP id p5mr8127485edb.223.1573192236234; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 21:50:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573192236; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PjLMfjHD5PWN8fdUU5jnnDnmreYk5uOcSgTSV5zr61xfrs9iVQCn/NcNHHpxbWogtR +L4fNBzrh3RcC9eqF7HWdbinBz+CAc3wEpeByBV1UXuAqko76SMZ5CiVN5R9wH5KBWi6 29VySquj5Fv/iqpDWtolhlP12bfqH54J7J7oWMw9Hm1Eq2c5Tbj+WxJ6ANv4mrnDb8nM nZFsocPX3fqUG41LFuJjkd+P0NiRdmREMdUnXazhTAq+5cOK3rbb6tYmDLH+Q/pWIOT9 pPsbrbWnkA2WgMV7s9K8LfnrvRZG5qHducAJuZBmK9bQHTNWNMzEbJacq6DNq+rJX2zF dhJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:cc:to:from :date; bh=Kowr7BLnjbXwyng7fCp7CwlJV5h/Soz0nyoMVfea040=; b=ihxZdg3724knW7ySydo4VdIUHZRMMIcM0FmGS2eekNpkn7Sa5Ecf9KukOGTcEOT1UE w/ASg0x/vBuFQkPDLyRTDQ3s7fvHhNBmMgu5h+pQ/KphfWJlDSurZMgT3xb5hohvn7kM LPvZ1wmeSz1rPWp7G9mzZ3HrTfiI3i8dm7bwlE0/pSZOzMMWJdUTcIcrno1ZSh8mnj1O HgefXO4XDCkZ5PcwxCrCgUm3OA7zRTdW+s9BKGoQ8x2suyjv7z47gg5nDhRE55HwN1LD +ajf3yNstBXYmk1abKsbwQQgF6ivPPXfNeQjOMBQMPxwXC/89X+eBNTQohvla5PIAy8c 8MKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hh19si2858893ejb.209.2019.11.07.21.50.12; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 21:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726103AbfKHFti (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 00:49:38 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:27014 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725877AbfKHFti (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 00:49:38 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA85kkNT071812 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 00:49:37 -0500 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w5122a28a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:49:37 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 05:49:34 -0000 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 8 Nov 2019 05:49:30 -0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xA85ms8x28180780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 05:48:54 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646A311C04A; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 05:49:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DA311C04C; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 05:49:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc0525413822.ibm.com (unknown [9.80.217.215]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 05:49:25 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 21:49:22 -0800 From: Ram Pai To: Michael Ellerman Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, paulus@ozlabs.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hch@lst.de, andmike@us.ibm.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, ram.n.pai@gmail.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, cai@lca.pw, tglx@linutronix.de, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: Ram Pai References: <1572902923-8096-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <1572902923-8096-2-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <1572902923-8096-3-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <87k18c56ej.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k18c56ej.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19110805-0016-0000-0000-000002C1CC24 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19110805-0017-0000-0000-0000332351B9 Message-Id: <20191108054922.GH5201@oc0525413822.ibm.com> Subject: RE: [RFC v1 2/2] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Use dma_iommu_ops for Secure VMs aswell. X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-11-08_01:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=937 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1910280000 definitions=main-1911080057 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 09:26:28PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Ram Pai writes: > > This enables IOMMU support for pseries Secure VMs. > > Can you give us some more explanation please? Yes. Will do. The simple explanation is -- it was a mistake. We should not have disabled IOMMU ops for secure guests. Though it enabled us to use virtio devices, with the help of some additional patches to the virtio subsystem; in hindsight, we should not have disabled IOMMU ops for secure VMs :-(. RP > > This is basically a revert of commit: > edea902c1c1e ("powerpc/pseries/iommu: Don't use dma_iommu_ops on secure guests") > > But neglects to remove the now unnecessary include of svm.h. > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c > > index 07f0847..189717b 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c > > @@ -1333,15 +1333,7 @@ void iommu_init_early_pSeries(void) > > of_reconfig_notifier_register(&iommu_reconfig_nb); > > register_memory_notifier(&iommu_mem_nb); > > > > - /* > > - * Secure guest memory is inacessible to devices so regular DMA isn't > > - * possible. > > - * > > - * In that case keep devices' dma_map_ops as NULL so that the generic > > - * DMA code path will use SWIOTLB to bounce buffers for DMA. > > Please explain what has changed to make this no longer necessary. > > cheers > > > - */ > > - if (!is_secure_guest()) > > - set_pci_dma_ops(&dma_iommu_ops); > > + set_pci_dma_ops(&dma_iommu_ops); > > } > > > > static int __init disable_multitce(char *str) > > -- > > 1.8.3.1 -- Ram Pai