Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp2313127ybx; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 02:39:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyde17XsXWWxH5X/1/eAU4JsiFZerSxMbOanOtbjQKFAQtv8jaCIpm0M/kSvjvyMzLi9/L2 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:df87:: with SMTP id b7mr9221603edy.296.1573209550920; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 02:39:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573209550; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GYvJ028RWB/DjuZxCig+1Xbh4gupd5zsBZLcmYzmywsbDjDpyyxXmWVaDmqMW7lLRl YZBoxSHY/hdXQx8sg3FySldufzqT7gL4yawORe/OncJBgqDI2B0XWxcqaRc/ItH4LB8S oDPOyEeX5IM1/6xWAxcilqCQAJGs1pytT2L8dze1HZDpOkkD68mkM/8GgBs7/ShKFYIG cg2nrHlr+3GypIQH4YiQ+FmfDGD7LvUKmi3Jy1k5xvpmK065gl1+HKc4x89XvM4j3AGy oXNtCOJB95FEEzlWL1BqCNM12EaNg5RmwSejxRSjGuKjqSU94jfrmXxZ4RHMaJs1hRKU vPPw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=p4k/Ufab7eQSnbts7xntx4kx5HJ+UYt5bneH43Ym3wo=; b=YRacGzE5jp6N/n9NREuo9nBKe8GMDBdCmN0Xy0StboUOvN8J5IKz9bu6rNUmvk1OHU zP+gHB5suhPDR6Dg/NL+ctZzXRtg5ndmGNtEmE2zYqg1pFJFecsVPRn1uAn96VIn7Rdk sV2jTHKXHZ2XH3wL2VJ8DnojMkuZ8U7VYuFGoXMsD2hgC0wVOBtLZKobGmStTmwi4PZC SM4WRgHFY2kJWa8luhJP3RcmJzyiGqV3XAsWQxI0yHzqTUJp3s4D+alcaMbDWlkfq6P8 7KBx3ZEdmFSvhYizB80oMQJdBIgyCL3VRWw7PBRQ1R1nu7xUBMGoO2gaFpRS+CglLX0Y 2rAQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g20si3866873eda.229.2019.11.08.02.38.47; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 02:39:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731371AbfKHKiO (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 05:38:14 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:50762 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726149AbfKHKiN (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 05:38:13 -0500 Received: from [5.158.153.52] (helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iT1ec-0006Q1-18; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:38:10 +0100 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 11:37:58 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Florian Weimer cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Darren Hart , Yi Wang , Yang Tao , Oleg Nesterov , Carlos O'Donell , Alexander Viro Subject: Re: [patch 00/12] futex: Cure robust/PI futex exit races In-Reply-To: <87o8xm65ar.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20191106215534.241796846@linutronix.de> <87zhh78gnf.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <87v9rv8g44.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <87o8xm95rt.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <87o8xm65ar.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Unpatched 5.4-rc6: > > > > FAIL: nptl/tst-thread-affinity-pthread > > original exit status 1 > > info: Detected CPU set size (in bits): 225 > > info: Maximum test CPU: 255 > > error: pthread_create for thread 253 failed: Resource temporarily unavailable > > Huh. Reverting your patches (at commit 26bc672134241a080a83b2ab9aa8abede8d30e1c) > fixes the test for me. > > > TBH, the futex changes have absolutely nothing to do with that resource > > fail. > > I suspect that there are some changes to task exit latency, which > triggers the latent resource management bug. Right, and depending on which hardware you run, this changes. On the big testbox I use the failure is also bouncing around between thread 252 and 254. Thanks, tglx