Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:46:06 +0100
From:   Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc:     Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] fs/xfs: Allow toggle of physical DAX flag
Message-ID: <20191108134606.GL20863@quack2.suse.cz>
References: <20191020155935.12297-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20191020155935.12297-6-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20191021004536.GD8015@dread.disaster.area>
 <20191021224931.GA25526@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
 <20191108131238.GK20863@quack2.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191108131238.GK20863@quack2.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri 08-11-19 14:12:38, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 21-10-19 15:49:31, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:45:36AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 08:59:35AM -0700, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> > > That, fundamentally, is the issue here - it's not setting/clearing
> > > the DAX flag that is the issue, it's doing a swap of the
> > > mapping->a_ops while there may be other code using that ops
> > > structure.
> > > 
> > > IOWs, if there is any code anywhere in the kernel that
> > > calls an address space op without holding one of the three locks we
> > > hold here (i_rwsem, MMAPLOCK, ILOCK) then it can race with the swap
> > > of the address space operations.
> > > 
> > > By limiting the address space swap to file sizes of zero, we rule
> > > out the page fault path (mmap of a zero length file segv's with an
> > > access beyond EOF on the first read/write page fault, right?).
> > 
> > Yes I checked that and thought we were safe here...
> > 
> > > However, other aops callers that might run unlocked and do the wrong
> > > thing if the aops pointer is swapped between check of the aop method
> > > existing and actually calling it even if the file size is zero?
> > > 
> > > A quick look shows that FIBMAP (ioctl_fibmap())) looks susceptible
> > > to such a race condition with the current definitions of the XFS DAX
> > > aops. I'm guessing there will be others, but I haven't looked
> > > further than this...
> > 
> > I'll check for others and think on what to do about this.  ext4 will have the
> > same problem I think.  :-(
> 
> Just as a datapoint, ext4 is bold and sets inode->i_mapping->a_ops on
> existing inodes when switching journal data flag and so far it has not
> blown up. What we did to deal with issues Dave describes is that we
> introduced percpu rw-semaphore guarding switching of aops and then inside
> problematic functions redirect callbacks in the right direction under this
> semaphore. Somewhat ugly but it seems to work.

Thinking about this some more, perhaps this scheme could be actually
transformed in something workable. We could have a global (or maybe per-sb
but I'm not sure it's worth it) percpu rwsem and we could transform aops
calls into:

percpu_down_read(aops_rwsem);
do_call();
percpu_up_read(aops_rwsem);

With some macro magic it needn't be even that ugly.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR