Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: drbd: remove a stay unlock in
 __drbd_send_protocol()
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Cc:     Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
        drbd-dev@tron.linbit.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
References: <20191107074847.GA11695@mwanda>
 <3a2d491f-3d24-3673-07f3-f601d5fafc97@acm.org>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <26822f67-1cd7-eeda-2caa-2bc7d420f173@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 8 Nov 2019 09:27:46 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3a2d491f-3d24-3673-07f3-f601d5fafc97@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 11/8/19 9:26 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/6/19 11:48 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> There are two callers of this function and they both unlock the mutex so
>> this ends up being a double unlock.
> 
> Is there a typo in the patch subject (stay -> stray)?

I fixed that up while applying, fwiw.

-- 
Jens Axboe