Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 8 Nov 2019 18:47:54 -0800
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To:     "liuqi (BA)" <liuqi115@hisilicon.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>,
        huangdaode <huangdaode@hisilicon.com>,
        linyunsheng <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION]perf stat: comment of miss ratio
Message-ID: <20191109024754.GA573472@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
References: <F57F094935A66448B135517D3F6EA397F35063@DGGEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F57F094935A66448B135517D3F6EA397F35063@DGGEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

>    Relevant code is checked to make sure that the ratio is calculated by
> 
>    L1-dcache-load-misses/L1-dcache-loads, data "7.58%=30249/399189*100%" also
> 
>    proves this conclusion.
> 
>    So, I'm not sure why we use "of all L1-dcache hits" here to describe miss
>    ratio,

Yes you're right it should be "of all L1-dcache accesses"

Please send a patch to fix the string and also check if this isn't wrong with some other
ratio too.

-Andi