Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 9 Nov 2019 16:53:46 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/93] 4.19.81-stable review
Message-ID: <20191109155346.GB1367023@kroah.com>
References: <20191027203251.029297948@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20191029162419.cumhku6smn2x2bq4@ucw.cz>
 <20191029180233.GA587491@kroah.com>
 <20191106185932.GA2183@amd>
 <20191106201818.GA105063@kroah.com>
 <c065df06c9e5d351b4a33c473fd397f27680489f.camel@codethink.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <c065df06c9e5d351b4a33c473fd397f27680489f.camel@codethink.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 04:43:17PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:18 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:59:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> [...]
> > > I'm confused. You said "by Tue ... 08:27:02 PM UTC". That 8 PM is 20h,
> > > but did the release on 10h GMT+1, or 9h UTC -- 9 AM.... so like 11
> > > hours early, if I got the timezones right.
> > > 
> > > Does PM mean something else in the above context?
> > 
> > Ugh, no, you are right, I was ignoring the PM thing, I thought the -u
> > option to date would give me a 24 hour date string, and so I thought
> > that was 8:27 in the morning.
> > 
> > Let me mess around with 'date' to see if I can come up with a better
> > string to use here.  I guess:
> > 	date --rfc-3339=seconds -u
> > would probably be best?
> 
> The --rfc-822 option should give you something close to the current
> format, but with 24-hour numbering.

Ah, missed that.  I'll go use that.

Also, I just remembered that if you look in the email headers, there's a
"X-KernelTest-Deadline:" field that uses the --iso-8601=minutes format.
I think kernelci uses that to parse for when it needs to finish things
by, but I don't know if that actually happens or not.

I'll go fix the string up for the next round.

thanks,

greg k-h