Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp4282174ybx; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 12:32:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxP0iFy8vi3Nr/9sCxQ5KVUxtB9sNW1HONzAuOjVj7iTGvDvbLQU+U+Q4ckCsrOOCx7JQZw X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d0ce:: with SMTP id u14mr17417612edo.225.1573331571968; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 12:32:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573331571; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MEapS/aq65CET8p5RDeag454slVYH6DBTp8W4rp5jTflL5BSZcJT41Eo7HCwkxsZi3 zzYV+kHdkan8Bjtk0Me3FMMLE1YtzMX66QqeOvZ9MjwkSBE5oyNU2Y0C5n+f8aFRYGVu PAuEVG+QJiYd7qZ7iLDg+5U80Q2NWy3CTCB9/5NyoJZ+bDEmPeCprsT/JhKpbNGCGvcp 6qd13/AnViC6+lVnHe6ibr5qDNcQEJIqWKQMNsuxqGH2T5euv42ge+7eXpK6GmmlY4gh SQJ4trCTJK7+Vaomon5reoI5k4b6osllEGWB0l3s7iT5aOF/0aNGKNh3cJkxxzykwIyT YCSw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=mRbOpFfrx6hcSiRBdOGKCVgENVRxHQOATC2TdUZAFdM=; b=ssVBmCjW2SgTzly20wMbd5hXEsR5WIRz9+RgPf17Y7OU9YBzrha04yJ/BGOzsfyST7 mgUBE7VhQLyHgN5EYKczNj2+AiY1Qp5hI6Pn688lqW3lgqNhRkVEnosGB8dlCjIUzlyU 78JDPXDfLVybHqG4pcqX5kFP9DS6SLS3OgCjY0jhEzrfQyZ37gHfD/jLITctSbopwUL9 3YOVHjjCPYtpNqB2nOYZpUiept8keJ94B23ND5t6VxBAOD9WaPiRMcwzE9KVSPe7FHkP F5Sfum2UtuAMsz1KvZAvdOJJBJwy3uHy9q2JE6yFxrdJdgFOSVKINIBJl5LP+71OBsBb ymHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dc16si6339314ejb.192.2019.11.09.12.32.29; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 12:32:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726823AbfKIU3y (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 9 Nov 2019 15:29:54 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:53666 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726467AbfKIU3e (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Nov 2019 15:29:34 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f00:1e2::d71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA8B114742051; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 12:29:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:35:27 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20191108.113527.2242883926552730503.davem@davemloft.net> To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: jwi@linux.ibm.com, sashal@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 204/205] s390/qeth: limit csum offload erratum to L3 devices From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20191108123416.GA732985@kroah.com> References: <20191108120025.GM4787@sasha-vm> <4d8f1938-af6e-7e0e-4085-2f7c53390b2d@linux.ibm.com> <20191108123416.GA732985@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sat, 09 Nov 2019 12:29:34 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Greg KH Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 13:34:16 +0100 > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:16:26PM +0100, Julian Wiedmann wrote: >> On 08.11.19 13:00, Sasha Levin wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 12:50:24PM +0100, Julian Wiedmann wrote: >> >> On 08.11.19 12:37, Sasha Levin wrote: >> >>> From: Julian Wiedmann >> >>> >> >>> [ Upstream commit f231dc9dbd789b0f98a15941e3cebedb4ad72ad5 ] >> >>> >> >>> Combined L3+L4 csum offload is only required for some L3 HW. So for >> >>> L2 devices, don't offload the IP header csum calculation. >> >>> >> >> >> >> NACK, this has no relevance for stable. >> > >> > Sure, I'll drop it. >> > >> > Do you have an idea why the centos and ubuntu folks might have >> > backported this commit into their kernels? >> > >> >> No clue, I trust they have their own reasons. >> > > I cant see centos backporting anything unless they were asked to do so. > And this really looks like a "bugfix" to me, why isn't this relevant for > any older kernel versions? Yeah seriously, this looks entirely legit.