Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161322AbWALXmJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:42:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161472AbWALXmJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:42:09 -0500 Received: from quark.didntduck.org ([69.55.226.66]:21407 "EHLO quark.didntduck.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161322AbWALXmI (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:42:08 -0500 Message-ID: <43C6E9CC.60509@didntduck.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:44:12 -0500 From: Brian Gerst User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nigel Cunningham CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Does a git pull have to be so big? References: <200601130845.29797.ncunningham@cyclades.com> <43C6DCD7.30709@didntduck.org> <200601130912.27374.ncunningham@cyclades.com> In-Reply-To: <200601130912.27374.ncunningham@cyclades.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2034 Lines: 63 Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Friday 13 January 2006 08:48, Brian Gerst wrote: >> Nigel Cunningham wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I try to do pulls reasonably often, but they always seem to be huge >>> downloads - I'm sure they're orders of magnitude bigger than a simple >>> patch would be. This leads me to ask, do they have to be so big? I'm on >>> 256/64 ADSL at home, did a pull yesterday at work iirc, and yet the pull >>> this morning has taken at least half an hour. Am I perhaps doing >>> something wrong? >>> >>> I'm using cogito .16-2 (ubuntu) and git 1.0.6. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Nigel >>> >>> #cg-fetch >>> Fetching head... >>> Fetching objects... >>> progress: 114 objects, 256992 bytes >>> Getting alternates list for >>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/ >>> progress: 376 objects, 1413225 bytes >>> Getting pack list for >>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/ >>> progress: 453 objects, 1924312 bytes >>> Getting index for pack 221c50e73e5ab65afededc14f1df0541b59ebdd5 >>> Getting pack 221c50e73e5ab65afededc14f1df0541b59ebdd5 >>> which contains 62727f8969438d99c3c34415d16611cf86f16140 >>> >>> (Still going) >>> - >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" >>> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >> Use git://git.kernel.org/... instead of http. >> >> -- >> Brian Gerst > > Ok. I'll give it a try - is it related to the packed files thing Jeff spoke > of? > > Regards, > > Nigel > Yes. If the objects are packed then the only way to get the objects by http are to download the whole pack. -- Brian Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/