Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: realtek: Add Realtek rtd1619 and mjolnir
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
To:     James Tai <james.tai@realtek.com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org>
References: <43B123F21A8CFE44A9641C099E4196FFCF91BEFA@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw>
 <25fdd8eb-f1a0-82ae-9c4b-22325b163b0e@suse.de>
 <43B123F21A8CFE44A9641C099E4196FFCF920024@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw>
 <7a05ac2c-00bc-b2ac-0a33-be0242d33188@suse.de>
Organization: SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Message-ID: <63d61bcb-fba0-5890-e46b-306c6cd2aa1c@suse.de>
Date:   Mon, 11 Nov 2019 04:09:26 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7a05ac2c-00bc-b2ac-0a33-be0242d33188@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Am 08.11.19 um 18:17 schrieb Andreas Färber:
> Hi James,
> 
> Am 08.11.19 um 16:36 schrieb James Tai:
>>> And double-check whether you actually need <2> - compare rtd129x.dtsi using
>>> <1> because nothing went beyond 32-bit address space. It was a review
>>> request back then. Can RTD1619 have more than 2 GiB RAM, with a second
>>> RAM region in high mem, requiring two cells for memory nodes?
>>>
>> The RTD1619 can support more than 2 GiB RAM.
> 
> How much? More than 0x98000000? The RTD1395 datasheet says up to 4 GB -
> does that mean it continues in a second region beyond 0xffffffff? Those
> locations should be excluded in the soc node ranges (which you sadly
> appear to have dropped in v2).
> 
> I'll try to post a patch for RTD1295 soon to demonstrate, it's just a
> little time-consuming with the 100+ commits on top of linux-next that
> need to be rebased then... RTD1195 may be quicker.

I've finished both and included patches for both in the RTD1395 series
just posted, along with other follow-up cleanups recently discussed.

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)