Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp5778798ybx; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 21:28:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyDC9WDFReU1L4EQBZ/BoG8U04QaUHtPGXoijhIXf6FaiBhxS/5CnRtvSAeVBE6D/o0Zxba X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ecad:: with SMTP id qh13mr21457266ejb.25.1573450110049; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 21:28:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573450110; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jRhRlUvYZzA0U3s9xlJ3Cso9+89cp3EG9cPejkVz0XJUFVcNkx3UmE7iunJO1MlrLg Q8isH7hxmnlb+G8Y5rUExMiv4nZHm1BHKgrfuUcnTTRGJ7/D9URdqiQRaMK6GDofBP6O uB6AoDi7ZicV7yzjCTmxVvDPDt5LYcZL/APZ+NjuPx52Ha+M5Rf4owN7cw3WMO0u5ij+ NqMtgB9xJwF4rFVr93h9PCugcakOjBn1gUW0eyEoZsxADrMt/CQk70qIursYcIgwtBsH cRmupXzC1fOSxJZyFQmC5KoHiGYUVjJHbRijNgW6SJyFy7NU3VmlXyQhjx8ORFkwvMo0 nzsg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=/UgqA3ivA8np5ScO1RxCmDtRLkYH7qx/NtzSG+dXaYQ=; b=Y3N8/jtm7ykX3R2VPQ9Vmf+JyH7U5FlGNSAZrMeyhMyKgXl2pjjtFvv8ft/L10DkME 9edhke3JFaB0bsIBGfHFWUpddlI+kdiZ/owZy78GBpGhdUPB9RbBWmJWgiaootaPkxvT JPUKSCsy60djBLZpktlI+rfPla7+YWxALIPTQcpTJsQ1A0oYaqbVlcCPWLrVMevCgt0r wfWtCLvkKti0HsjdQElKNxHXeDyV5d03Y7x4C11drScj/kTmyHpwGx/VvOTGvNevskfA OzgItn2TRO9AnBoPrxDdkwNqOPzv9O1hZRGbOU6Cdo5RwqGl4Bbe9LWXtE0DOcKtRaJb Ls0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r18si8542368eja.211.2019.11.10.21.28.06; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 21:28:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726953AbfKKF1F (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:27:05 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:40610 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726768AbfKKF1F (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:27:05 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41F531B; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 21:27:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.163.1.187] (unknown [10.163.1.187]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C75D73F6C4; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 21:27:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Fix comment for efi_mem_type() wrt absent physical addresses To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ard Biesheuvel References: <1573449229-13918-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 10:57:37 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1573449229-13918-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/11/2019 10:43 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > A previous commit f99afd08a45f ("efi: Update efi_mem_type() to return an > error rather than 0") changed the return type from EFI_RESERVED_TYPE to > -EINVAL when the searched physical address is not present in any memory > descriptor. But the comment preceding the function never changed. Lets > change the comment now to reflect the new return type -EINVAL. In the subject line, s/PATCH/PATCH V2/. Not sending yet another patch just to fix this (in order to reduce spam). But please let me know in case that will be essential. > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel > Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual > --- > Changes in V2: > > - Changed comment for efi_mem_type() instead of the return type per Ard > > V1: (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1149002/) > > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c > index 77ca52d86e30..47b0bf7a2b7f 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c > @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ u64 efi_mem_attributes(unsigned long phys_addr) > * > * Search in the EFI memory map for the region covering @phys_addr. > * Returns the EFI memory type if the region was found in the memory > - * map, EFI_RESERVED_TYPE (zero) otherwise. > + * map, -EINVAL otherwise. > */ > int efi_mem_type(unsigned long phys_addr) > { >