Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp6020984ybx; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 02:32:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxStcUC0obDf+WksveX7bab95xDVqxyD1gA59mWEJDGvnYGoxs7Kln57loL9ILVqg+hLVU3 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:512:: with SMTP id m18mr25848096edv.250.1573468357663; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 02:32:37 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573468357; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZjaXstkiA6xzZVl5DRdu5EpXe5aev0PXwLHnyDRBiKIJvepXH2OluzQPAzooJudV+s P2K+dYXMZlGZrARojyaX/QnHibRoalyeLwt/pm64FegEDsgjPRMJNPKG1C/MO2uYykBV c5VhoygZyz+vn6XsFamn4wP+ELBGIdcdDDwBAnWxYp9myS5n320GzpN/f1Zcra4A9H/W bgZ/caln3PPbO7GjX8/92IFco/KpinQFwjKFQEpRO9dF4mDViaQXE965MQ6rNmnR15+C pCSsIKO2UlwHXQNJl4yKtNLpP1crbqWq8qnzDo6kbBvUuOdXnzbDNDi7bgc7NfK0CF7H VSxw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=DKZPcl4wWd8AJB5VAy9EVTe4u5B3nGftcsHzRUwia8o=; b=w1TkY9ATZCcuayyKQl09ZSLoYvPejse+efYss6Y2+95QRieB4tK7BqGN7zw844CO30 AmXd83h//9KLFlettk9Qtza2RVQKil/RVP3SAH591Qj2+D+XZlkflg04SSCmBeTCiIfz e+32VrUSPF9k0yr8wby9uzh1/VxiFZCwAkexrWRUlo4bskCF0VJ4XHZ5KIbrZQT1yc7+ NU2Y3V5v1BnSlHCfFYV5dz6WlE0ZrIg8Wfx5l5ZlyQpbgm/XMC0WFLo3HFCx2GHCbM1C BVL+0rc9adI/UrK/aNzFGIV7IqZwkndB7PKYideNqobK8J1srj9UGEEOXloo2UDN1mle dVOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b7si10949071ede.12.2019.11.11.02.32.14; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 02:32:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726923AbfKKK3a (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:29:30 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:48604 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726952AbfKKK32 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:29:28 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 1A21068BE1; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:29:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:29:23 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Guo Ren , Michal Simek , Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , Guan Xuetao , the arch/x86 maintainers , alpha , "open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE" , Linux ARM , "open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "moderated list:NIOS2 ARCHITECTURE" , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Parisc List , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390 , Linux-sh list , sparclinux , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-mtd , linux-arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/21] asm-generic: ioremap_uc should behave the same with and without MMU Message-ID: <20191111102923.GA12974@lst.de> References: <20191029064834.23438-1-hch@lst.de> <20191029064834.23438-11-hch@lst.de> <20191111101531.GA12294@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Ok, fair enough. Let's just go with your version for now, if only to not > hold your series up more. I'd still suggest we change atyfb to only > use ioremap_uc() on i386 and maybe ia64. I can send a patch for that. I don't think we even need it on ia64. But lets kick off a dicussion with the atyfb, x86 and ia64 maintainers after this series is in. Which was kinda my plan anyway.