Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 20:16:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 20:16:12 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:20489 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 20:16:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 21:16:33 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: joeja@mindspring.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.11 && 2.4.12 Message-ID: <20011012211633.D9395@conectiva.com.br> Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , joeja@mindspring.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Url: http://advogato.org/person/acme Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 08:11:46PM -0400, joeja@mindspring.com escreveu: > Last night I tried 2.4.12. I patched a stock 2.4.10 kernel with > 2.4.11.donuse and then with 2.4.12. It compiled the kernel, but make > modules failed miserably with all sorts of errors and warnings. Should I > have patched my 2.4.10 with 2.4.12 and just skipped over 2.4.11? The nope, you have to apply patch-2.4.12 on top of patch-2.4.11 on top of linux-2.4.10. > patching went fine, the compiling was a mess. > Needless to say that I have reverted back to 2.4.10 which seems to be > doing fine on my machine. 2.4.11 and 2.4.12 are not recommended AFAIK, stay with 2.4.10 or go to 2.4.13-pre1. - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/