Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp6901839ybx; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 17:04:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwTCrLgjzcMd42uR5WhDxZVaG0ujiXAl0iAXBdtes4gJjTCoAzdXKhA3bnRfCSkNoKEn01R X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2061:: with SMTP id qp1mr26406543ejb.43.1573520695917; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 17:04:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573520695; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0CdbhQnIQEp0j+gvuG9kSUgiwxb56wg4+LjVi2iYFi1Xjv/XqVJzwXIXN3AJBh6WP3 ygAiINYTLRm4pt0bXIWyO4PPKUYm3JABw5Cy1tONg22ifg/77P+oDqY04x80ezddVY4+ 39ycFwFFEE5Mg6Ncgg62D3Kj+im9HMxop+X8bbAetOVVpfTIb96DIc/4ODOTBDJPNIV9 F6TxDxj8KAeuNJmZQO3e8NGeVQeThmaDLJuif0+SYw8zpOjDTzpQe7VMNkS2pYPTCQej yiUd518bClCOWiO7LtqJ9LSNSG1t1fDNjt0gZ+ws7ygQzt/FRa5SWbIkbgJP24rn/6/h I20Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=cMxVCoOu7ViKltEVSB4WlSX+gbn3HxjPlwSKfd7Xf6w=; b=ZQ+eSfMrQ6ACajApY5x+z7D2lEgf7xmZpSH8frUSauDW3ZkFWvf+D+MSRBlvrIfqyR ozlMqKiiOoS3Uhnxbla81vrw4kCkX0Tvo/uOEiZrEJ2VxHFe5bf0gfJ+MsS2vgo4O2zj Xcl17/WJ9vTdbPv2Gyto5dacRTPTLhEL+95cLVS5/F/twK3gMsU7nDJoCLV3ZQ9Q7LQC e22unW3Wa8589EysAIEp7f6u35V7lY+p6+zxVt8fL7xVWQK+/fPu41JhAW/8/pAEeWE/ QJ5rs6sG8r7PaieSJ2bpzHUTIC4dU8vAVSF1w0DyjCSxB8qHJ8fSHT0Raq9xeHNtPGfL MhTA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w25si11959945edl.418.2019.11.11.17.04.32; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 17:04:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727409AbfKLBA1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:00:27 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:47020 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727202AbfKLA7o (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:59:44 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Nov 2019 16:59:43 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,294,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="213898293" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.21]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2019 16:59:43 -0800 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EEBE6301A7E; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:59:42 -0800 (PST) From: Andi Kleen To: jolsa@kernel.org Cc: acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Optimize perf stat for large number of events/cpus Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:59:29 -0800 Message-Id: <20191112005941.649137-1-andi@firstfloor.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [v6: Address review feedback. Merge one patch again to avoid broken immediate state.] This patch kit optimizes perf stat for a large number of events on systems with many CPUs and PMUs. Some profiling shows that the most overhead is doing IPIs to all the target CPUs. We can optimize this by using sched_setaffinity to set the affinity to a target CPU once and then doing the perf operation for all events on that CPU. This requires some restructuring, but cuts the set up time quite a bit. In theory we could go further by parallelizing these setups too, but that would be much more complicated and for now just batching it per CPU seems to be sufficient. At some point with many more cores parallelization or a better bulk perf setup API might be needed though. In addition perf does a lot of redundant /sys accesses with many PMUs, which can be also expensve. This is also optimized. On a large test case (>700 events with many weak groups) on a 94 CPU system I go from real 0m8.607s user 0m0.550s sys 0m8.041s to real 0m3.269s user 0m0.760s sys 0m1.694s so shaving ~6 seconds of system time, at slightly more cost in perf stat itself. On a 4 socket system with the savings are more dramatic: real 0m15.641s user 0m0.873s sys 0m14.729s to real 0m4.493s user 0m1.578s sys 0m2.444s so 11s difference in the user visible set up time. Also available in git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc perf/stat-scale-9 v1: Initial post. v2: Rebase. Fix some minor issues. v3: Rebase. Address review feedback. Fix one minor issue v4: Modified based on review feedback. Now it maintains all_cpus per evlist. There is still a need for cpu_index iteration to get the correct index for indexing the file descriptors. Fix bug with unsorted cpu maps, now they are always sorted. Some cleanups and refactoring. v5: Split patches. Redo loop iteration again. Fix cpu map merging for uncore. Remove duplicates from cpumaps. Add unit tests. v6: Address review feedback. Fix some bugs. Add more comments. Merge one invalid patch split. -Andi