Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp6937095ybx; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 17:46:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPlu1eRiI8Y30yb8JoVMH2Olamj9weCb2HotaId0QcE42wVBiHsmBhCZtDc+k3CqYhLIso X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f109:: with SMTP id gv9mr26295500ejb.196.1573523186978; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 17:46:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573523186; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qJLmZ0A8IcSXU8+E8Yhyt0Vge5o7vsnWskwKaNzRfcJWFMaBhqzru4IcNvDLn1G7XM jLl1P3v4WpoKjhkF0Ah+eWJ6cHuSi4Dg0r2Casytz0SQTX0EyMmNaNaIXaVwU86ufJVr vG1CVPRVlw7j2LGXzp0UjhUvBINCLy3qdEoeZ4GBLNIgLbxOxiPEJAkgN4Hti4tkLsGS UtUcFC5F0/Hd2+M0p5ccnqJPgdhvUC0HoVIWVHxaWW+VLMkt3F+8MkBzPZZfEwy1U8CY M1PpddRIUXaGpOKDXo6PBzjdaXuSaHAoSKfzPCDgzF9NkIlLifwrhm736oRruvzKSkau jCxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:organization :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=JX87oWuK2rPLtZ7YbQ6PqdFdJ+Od8uVqG/c6zEu/ZUY=; b=qIYp5up2FTCEuCxdbCFgs9T1i9jguwdOdVumtLEbd4i0LfnXXfioEYARmWeTF7FujJ lIFqS3TlkYupuO3sDdfoiAiw9vGUrwWB8cz09FYnYq/nIdlbrlN7aMw2ABTJdjArbPNz ebXiZpWU1U5hHZhpDmMLKiXnGE4eZ1JuWYTJptOiozfi4NDb0L321ci1cXZDI0BrsxDH XJeNK37bJeXmRbd22jxY5QDrnr+9RvB8v+nBjufLbinVCCtvvFEezvPR4wtf2FuxDaJC taXADpUKagQB/v/2hj4zlSdhDBKAcNbOmlmb+sKkpSYPAVgiY1sOy/OJSrVn9RHnp4t5 UuGg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f4si10285458ejc.218.2019.11.11.17.46.02; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 17:46:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726957AbfKLBpV (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:45:21 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56230 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726793AbfKLBpU (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:45:20 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF631AC68; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <84ccea513e4ff21bdd374af01574e4bf04946bb6.camel@suse.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/19] Core scheduling v4 From: Dario Faggioli To: Vineeth Remanan Pillai , Phil Auld Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan , Julien Desfossez , Peter Zijlstra , Tim Chen , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Paul Turner , Linus Torvalds , Linux List Kernel Mailing , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , Kees Cook , Greg Kerr , Aaron Lu , Aubrey Li , Valentin Schneider , Mel Gorman , Pawan Gupta , Paolo Bonzini Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 02:45:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20191031184236.GE5738@pauld.bos.csb> Organization: SUSE Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZsTu4C/KBLte9v9VjR6R" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-ZsTu4C/KBLte9v9VjR6R Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 10:03 -0400, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote: > Hi Phil, >=20 > > Unless I'm mistaken 7 of the first 8 of these went into sched/core > > and are now in linux (from v5.4-rc1). It may make sense to rebase > > on > > that and simplify the series. > >=20 > Thanks a lot for pointing this out. We shall test on a rebased 5.4 RC > and post the changes soon, if the tests goes well. For v3, while > rebasing > to an RC kernel, we saw perf regressions and hence did not check the > RC kernel this time. You are absolutely right that we can simplify > the > patch series with 5.4 RC. >=20 And, in case it's useful to anybody, here's a rebase of this series on top of 5.4-rc7: https://github.com/dfaggioli/linux/tree/wip/sched/v5.4-rc7-coresched This also includes Tim's patch (this one <5e3cea14-28d1-bf1e-cabe-fb5b48fdeadc@linux.intel.com>) and is, for now, *only* compile tested. Regards --=20 Dario Faggioli, Ph.D http://about.me/dario.faggioli Virtualization Software Engineer SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- <> (Raistlin Majere) --=-ZsTu4C/KBLte9v9VjR6R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEES5ssOj3Vhr0WPnOLFkJ4iaW4c+4FAl3KDqkACgkQFkJ4iaW4 c+7m5w//aGiX4TRS2rKI4xA7E32sBx9oS/QbqVtLBwVL2fB4lWDMCcRcI2r2q040 dboG+MDJAX226GEK8+o5YZLBaxuVo4tO50CnQq9W7CfjWVCBfO86kSIbHwx6zaKl cDDXf+mRko+OD3izrKCAdFki1S8BcRCNUNs86QjiCk0yarEgoO8kPeNYTYpmK54g 9zne3J3lzzI43MNK25dS5sf+xWn1F8Oa+TI8g4fodYA4+hAhCEphkc2nQMcxsxr2 IImAa+RQv0ubKZ2suMRnbaPYYjLq8YSAxtywuoqpxc30jbb8HQdH4Q2Titj/AI25 HpacQn5yrMHvdHFX+0jzt8uBjLUOvSTN5Ja2PktGcLY/AJcmP+iiM3EUiT8i+TU/ Xc0OdKoTB9TgKNDD242S5J6x6wag0GT/C9RndqNL5hKpLapU4ibNTRmbxYI0CfFl LRkitfDUyZo9FRasMLUCvKY8psH6Qn/GK9EDomZNY5HyV21q4N7KuDtKAKuD1BMi gSPiICZVAxd1DvUgkwS3xBv05EhZDoWXvj3YId7GYn2XdKijw+kvP3iEwc7yJMFZ wL69uN1uG8ij3bYQuXsywBvrU0spfV+kRfwJTsKcY5kE0OmYsLyYjT9cHFCufz/y AMcY5pSTUPnlz/Kur1Y2716ts0xz5wHCqlZYn3urRUjKCPBSANE= =Ohgt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZsTu4C/KBLte9v9VjR6R--