Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422697AbWAMOfM (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:35:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422698AbWAMOfM (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:35:12 -0500 Received: from mail13.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.194]:65428 "EHLO mail13.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422697AbWAMOfK (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:35:10 -0500 From: Con Kolivas To: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:34:45 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 Cc: Paolo Ornati , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , Nick Piggin , Peter Williams References: <20060113114607.54c83fc8@localhost> <5.2.1.1.2.20060113124751.00bf2660@pop.gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20060113124751.00bf2660@pop.gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601140134.46457.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 835 Lines: 18 On Saturday 14 January 2006 00:01, Mike Galbraith wrote: > At 09:51 PM 1/13/2006 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > >See my followup patches that I have posted following "[PATCH 0/5] sched - > >interactivity updates". The first 3 patches are what you tested. These > >patches are being put up for testing hopefully in -mm. > > Then the (buggy) version of my simple throttling patch will need to come > out. (which is OK, I have a debugged potent++ version) Your code need not be mutually exclusive with mine. I've simply damped the current behaviour. Your sanity throttling is a good idea. Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/