Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 21:05:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 21:05:17 -0400 Received: from chac.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.19.54]:61191 "EHLO chac.inf.utfsm.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 21:05:02 -0400 Message-Id: <200110130104.f9D14e5b021424@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> To: Jeff Garzik cc: Matt Domsch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: crc32 cleanups In-Reply-To: Message from Jeff Garzik of "Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:07:14 EST." Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 21:04:38 -0400 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik said: [...] > We must consider the case where the kernel is built, and then a random > 3rd party module comes along that needs crc32 features. An ar library > won't cut it, and neither will [the existing crc32 method of] patching > linux/lib/crc32.c. That leaves (a) unconditionally building it into the > kernel, or (b) Makefile and Config.in rules. (b) won't work if my kernel has no CRC32 modules, and a random 3rd party module needs it. So it looks like firm builtin is the only real option (a). -- Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/