Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:37:53 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       adobriyan@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.15-mm2: alpha broken
Message-ID: <20060113163753.GJ27946@ftp.linux.org.uk>
References: <20060107052221.61d0b600.akpm@osdl.org> <20060107210646.GA26124@mipter.zuzino.mipt.ru> <20060107154842.5832af75.akpm@osdl.org> <20060110182422.d26c5d8b.pj@sgi.com> <20060113141154.GL29663@stusta.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060113141154.GL29663@stusta.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1031
Lines: 21

On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:11:54PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> It can always happen that one out of fifty patches breaks compilation on 
> some architectures, and I'm for sure not the one with the worst 
> errors/patches ratio.
> 
> -mm is an experimental kernel and although breakages are unfortunate, 
> they do happen.
> 
> I'm already compiling every single patch with both a non-modular and a 
> completely modular .config for i386. This is the amout of testing I can 
> afford. If this isn't considered enough I have to stop submtting 
> patches.

This is not considered enough.  If you can't be arsed to set up cross-compilers
on your box, please *stop* shitting in headers that might affect something
other than i386.  It's not like doing a cross-toolchain was something hard...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/