Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp763020ybc; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:50:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxH3uluf67R5ogTz7AZ817BvIx0/xGj5M0CWYROZKKKmaIPbotTfEFRj63eoJIcwd8dAsa/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3d2:: with SMTP id c18mr29408046eja.111.1573577407053; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:50:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573577407; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=C/X3kMbJhTMn00s8CzLdEJ7o3slPyIBHFPuxKxmpXVaCDkZOV0Z5q8xaoBFEjNlqIS qwN76259H8SBXkAPnQvtcPWFUC30cLx0wWZtmbbTvN+ayZ+n9KKczMJ/GRTCLVOVOLXh z3++Eku7bd2vAY4cV9fjOSmjLpI9wG3D+bEmJ/eLZ/VddibGoTrx1gWo1mWAeMbenNX8 8BBf/TbAVrRP5+acbEgzU88eO1/EVEG+HlBsRkbhEH16WEU+q4mRCgOf0vCJgE55q2Sa zwqjZLFTxZ8qn0eqF2RjdgebQ1Hq6s9ZTZEI8RHgu4lpl0jeuwA/kFFR+fGhlUhiGJBv PvFg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=Oy+N+vnwmOMVrxxdWD894xCKEekLLG3ksfWHq1QZ4+I=; b=TFFNlFjciNbCc2N4XhI+tgCfvD+OPe6WDzDLer3s6QLoiUo2Ge/5P8Z7OTV5IEnW6j +kgJqWcdVDy3+PI/yk3DIAzPeiTC1g2ACQ1y4T7U4jI4DPu7QM8oH+eBnpfAdTg1s+Dr 63UEGarvFP8kSG/QB73EulMsVa1LZ738juVMSMdge/JBUtpQ9uZhfHjiYAxKqmkeWUmQ y/VQKh3rJPIYv6cy7NwSXjXPlheEKBLCRgogoSfCapTRF/8aXGt80awPxHy1WNDF7uhq +XLhAl0+lBrfwFs484l+5VBHeh7CYh1C41deZnAdKwPb/kZQKq4u65YWcDCK0rBS8b4d vodg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g19si1019380edb.280.2019.11.12.08.49.42; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:50:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726970AbfKLQqn (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:46:43 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:41904 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726896AbfKLQqm (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:46:42 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC6867DE; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 09:46:38 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: "Daniel W. S. Almeida" Cc: Frank.li@nxp.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Documentation: perf: fix kernel-doc warnings in imx-ddr.rst Message-ID: <20191112094638.54459a23@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20191107185755.29586-1-dwlsalmeida@gmail.com> References: <20191107185755.29586-1-dwlsalmeida@gmail.com> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:57:55 -0300 "Daniel W. S. Almeida" wrote: > From: "Daniel W. S. Almeida" > > Unexpected indentation errors were reported due to missing blank lines. > Now fixed. No change in content otherwise. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel W. S. Almeida So this is in no way your fault, but this particular file has been the subject of some merge conflicts in linux-next already, so it's probably best not to mess with it further at the moment. Could I ask you to resubmit the patch after the 5.5 merge window? Thanks, jon