Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423054AbWAMWfT (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:35:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423053AbWAMWfT (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:35:19 -0500 Received: from sipsolutions.net ([66.160.135.76]:44817 "EHLO sipsolutions.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423051AbWAMWfR (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:35:17 -0500 Subject: Re: wireless: recap of current issues (other issues) From: Johannes Berg To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060113222408.GM16166@tuxdriver.com> References: <20060113195723.GB16166@tuxdriver.com> <20060113212605.GD16166@tuxdriver.com> <20060113213237.GH16166@tuxdriver.com> <20060113222408.GM16166@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ykjEvNySpsB7NBD/naZC" Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:35:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1137191711.2520.69.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2356 Lines: 57 --=-ykjEvNySpsB7NBD/naZC Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 17:24 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > Radiotap headers make sense for an rfmon virtual device. I don't > think it makes sense for "normal" usage. Should there be an option > for radiotap headers on non-rfmon links? Yes. For hardware debugging. > Rfmon interferes w/ other interfaces, but may be handy to enter/leave > w/ little effort. Perhaps a config option for physical device to > suspend/resume all (non-rfmon) virtual devices before/after enabling > rfmon virtual device? (Would multiple rfmon devices even make sense? > If not, is it worth restricting that?) Multiple rfmon devices make sense in hypothetical or future hardware if different channels are supported on one WiPHY at once, but the rfmon device shall be restricted to a single one. Since we probably need a way to deactivate virtual devices anyway, having a config option to suspend/resume all others doesn't make sense -- userspace programs can just as well cycle over them and do it themselves. johannes --=-ykjEvNySpsB7NBD/naZC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (SIP Solutions) iQIVAwUAQ8grHaVg1VMiehFYAQKR3xAAmJDpSsqv5KKOH4vuzA7FpqEswRPfKzgu XtZq0DbsjRbi2P8cRG1wyBuswHxu3kQaoU46HAuICJmbpxj/VMuzIuZOlwQXqUE8 V+XneiwH4Aj09OxLOjlzvg6hmzy10+8XOvA9PrlnLQWmFLkpMHsoahdtG46ho6Da t7AU/Atzb7KuefkQgeMFejqiEmDnw5IZQTMSUwjkThwKqTowd7dxdmpv1M1EOkhA bK/Ion4x+4Tkkd4gX7vVuvCfK3dEGsr//PSq0pRo1pBZZlap6w+IZZ6Sxc2qOmgh JrUo5i314GcQIdAT4GVkbU1Ryr6vLjqCnAY9Cd/PQu8EhP0QX2weO3fB9SQZ4ktb ZXbgQwshV40F1RF+S7Azmyg94wK+7tixcYZFMo95GPGsKUmcMz9NP6Hv7cpfk9P1 y/MxyVEz5zVyOEvy1Uz3vfJ09vj5P6nc0aumk2rCve3P+v/ptZp1Dxm4rHTd3sFw TqYODhBj7kM6hbS3RWetVZZDPbNeYxwXoZSJtmOTeLf6CnIAuVtXOUI5ma5QnGCb 2XK+ovPm/+SeAUuW1i7nESimFjZavlOR865JGbVyXm9lP0BcoM2ZYeWaRU927atn U8wuC/zs3K8EA7Z6lic2kuISaXxzn0naemkISbr5UFF440LKqTjF4i3D0hlVjCmn DitDzVXjIMY= =FWgz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ykjEvNySpsB7NBD/naZC-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/